Why did Hillary lose to Obama eight years ago?

Updated on : January 17, 2022 by Alisha Jones



Why did Hillary lose to Obama eight years ago?

At the end of the Bush administration, many Americans hated a vague notion called "political establishment." Clinton was seen as a quintessential "Washington insider" and that was deemed a bad thing. Obama was perceived (mostly incorrectly) as an "outsider" and therefore attractive.

Much the same thing happened at the end of the Obama administration and led to the election of Trump.

The Democratic party liked him more, felt he had more appeal and less baggage. People seem to think that the party is there to represent the people and it is not, it is like a club and do you know how not everyone in a club makes the rules and decisions? Well, the same thing happens with the party leadership. There are active members and most simply register with a party to vote in the primaries.

Some thoughts:

  1. He (Mitt Romney) was never a very popular candidate. Despite media reports to the contrary, most people were never "hot" about Mitt Romney. It just "wasn't Obama" and that, in the end, was not enough to win him the presidency.
  2. The Republican Party is in disarray: If the Republican Party had been a more united party and given its full support to Mitt Romney, it could have won. However, Romney was beaten and bruised by members of his own party in the primaries and recovered from those assaults.
  3. Romney's tax returns: This hung on Romney like a millstone. He simply cou
Keep reading

Some thoughts:

  1. He (Mitt Romney) was never a very popular candidate. Despite media reports to the contrary, most people were never "hot" about Mitt Romney. It just "wasn't Obama" and that, in the end, was not enough to win him the presidency.
  2. The Republican Party is in disarray: If the Republican Party had been a more united party and given its full support to Mitt Romney, it could have won. However, Romney was beaten and bruised by members of his own party in the primaries and recovered from those assaults.
  3. Romney's tax returns: This hung on Romney like a millstone. He simply could not avoid the suspicions that he was hiding a secret and that cost him the necessary votes. In hindsight, he should have published his statements, regardless of the consequences.
  4. Paul Ryan - Fox News promotions and conservative pundits aside, Rep. Ryan was and is a distinctly unsavory individual. He really contributed little to Romney's ticket (his presence didn't even allow Romney to capture Ryan's home state of Wisconsin) and his budget plan made many seniors fear for their Medicare benefits. This was an exceptionally reckless choice of running mate from the start that never got better.
  5. The Republican Party was seen as being on the "wrong side" of several key social problems: abortion, gay rights, equal pay for women; they were all crucial issues and the Republican Party apparently decided to place its flag on the side that did not appeal to the majority of Americans. If they had taken even moderate positions on these issues, they might have been successful. They chose a more extreme point of view and the result was failure.
  6. The Republican Party is not a "big top". By that I mean the Republicans entered their convention as an almost entirely white American party in an era where the country is moving away from that. With few minorities and fewer women (even white American women, curiously), they simply did not appeal to the masses and the loss of Romney was the result.
  7. The economy is improving: The Republican Party never managed to argue that they could (or could) improve an economy that is already improving. His best arguments about the US economy were "it should have happened faster," which is not a winning claim. An improving economy brought their positions on social issues to the fore and cost them the election.
  8. The Republican Party did not come up with its strongest candidates: From Florida Senator Marco Rubio to New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, all the "heavyweights" in the Republican Party read the political "tea leaves" and decided that 2012 was not your year. Without his best and brightest, there was simply no way the Republicans could win against President Obama.
  9. The Republican Party was played - from framing Romney as an out-of-touch plutocrat - to making it appear that a popular American president was actually an "underdog"; In promoting articles about the Republican Party's clumsy efforts to disenfranchise voters, the Democratic Party outperformed the Republican Party. As the Republican Party concentrated on one defense area, the Democrats simply changed course and attacked them from another angle. The political dominance displayed by the president and his reelection campaign was truly "masterful" and was simply too much for the Republicans.
  10. President Obama is not such a bad leader: Although the Republican Party and conservative pundits tried to scratch him off with a lot of brushes (including the dreaded Jimmy Carter label, a nightmare for any successful Democrat), they never could. Obama Passed A Necessary Health Care Measure; helped save the American auto industry; prevented the collapse of the American economy ... and killed Osama bin Laden. Alone, any of them would have earned him re-election. The sum total of them was too great for any candidate to defeat him in this electoral cycle.

There are more elements (I was going to mention Romney's dog) but I think ten elements will suffice.

Willard Mitt Romney lost because he never had a chance.

Why did Hillary Clinton lose the 2016 US elections? Good question. By November, Hillary's campaign (also the Obama White House) had gone from winning the presidency to shaming Donald Trump (and accusing Trump of Russian collusion).

First, the Trump campaign was shocked to find that they were going to lose on November 8, 2016, Election Day. Now acting US President Donald J. Trump never believed the polls or much research. He has a feeling about America and its people. Hillary spent twice what Donald did on the campaign. She raised half of what Obama raised in little money

Keep reading

Why did Hillary Clinton lose the 2016 US elections? Good question. By November, Hillary's campaign (also the Obama White House) had gone from winning the presidency to shaming Donald Trump (and accusing Trump of Russian collusion).

First, the Trump campaign was shocked to find that they were going to lose on November 8, 2016, Election Day. Now acting US President Donald J. Trump never believed the polls or much research. He has a feeling about America and its people. Hillary spent twice what Donald did on the campaign. She raised half of what Obama raised in small contributions of money (a bad omen). Donald Trump had a plane, an energetic base that hated Bill and Hillary Clinton and had rallies all over the United States in states that could change elections. The same base hated MSNBC and CNN. He was pretty sure he was going to win until Election Day. All exit voting was available that afternoon for the candidate and his family,

At Trump's first campaign rally on Cape Cod in Massachusetts, all donor money was returned because in the first primaries, Trump wanted to use his own money. To hell with the lobbyists and K Street. Supporters of the Democrats (we're not talking independents, we're talking liberal Democrats) were donating cash because they didn't want a paper trail that a check could leave for nosy reporters and a Hillary / Democrat operative ready to seek revenge for a cross. party donation.

At rallies, where Trump spoke for an hour or more (no script), no teleprompter, there were lines of more than a mile of staunch supporters waiting to enter. They were all day events. People waited patiently in the rain and snow. They bought MAGA caps and T-shirts. There were tens of thousands of people who attended these events, like the one in Lowell, Massachusetts, just across the line from New Hampshire. Trump had a lot of fun. He really enjoyed the campaign test, the energy, the excitement. He was on TV and on social media constantly. And it was pissing off the establishment. All the things he liked to do on a daily basis.

Almost by divine intervention, Hillary was having heart problems, fainting, etc. Huma's husband was going to jail. Convicted of sexting minors. As another long-forgotten sexual pervert, Bill Clinton was spotted with the Energizer Bunny in Chappaqua, NY. A former Secret Service agent, Bill's ex-high school girlfriend, and Juanita Broaddrick were hanging around the radio, some selling books about the two from Whitewater / Little Rock. The book tours affected Hillary's credibility. Hillary stopped listening to her husband, Bill. Bill warned him over and over again. But she wanted to win alone and did not want to follow Bill Clinton's advice. Instead, he was following the advice of a 20-something idiot with computer data. Got damn, any day of the week he would take political advice from Bill Clinton. He couldn't campaign 24/7. Unlike Trump, that seemed to be everywhere. Then Jim Comey dumped a pile of garbage just before the election.

Second, you need to understand that "pink" hats only number about 4 million in the US All this nonsense of socialism and the right to choose is only stoked by a very small part of the electorate, some of whom do not. they vote. They live in New York City and the California coast (two states that Hillary passed through). But, the mainstream media turn them into this huge wave of voters. Are not. All low-educated Trump supporters vote, always vote (maybe not for Dole, McCain & Mittens). And they vote by the tens of millions.

Third, after George W. Bush, the evangelical vote was not cast in favor of John McCain and Mitt Romney (they did not actually attend GHW Bush, not in large numbers). No group hated those two RINOs (Republicans in name only) more than Evangelicals. Perceptions on the previous two standard bearers: John McCain was really a neoconservative with no ingrained value except having sex. Romney was and is a capitalist who looks down on 99% of us. He affirmed it in some private speeches. And he coined the phrase the 99 percent. The Big Numbers: 1 in 3 evangelicals in the United States are people of color. They go to church more than once a week. They read the Holy Bible. They love Ben Carson. They love Herman Cain. They love our military, our patriotic past and present. They love and revere the national flag. And they love Donald J. Trump because he loves all of those things. Period.

They were not looking for an impeccably clean and sinless leader, but a defender of the faith; someone with a brave heart; someone who defends the First and Second Amendments. Someone who wouldn't necessarily be pro-life, but would defend the pro-life position (the exact opposite of Ronald Reagan, who did nothing for the pro-life crowd). And they found in Donald J. Trump the most unlikely candidate. Trump was personally a vulgar television, a 21st-century Howard Hill professor, a four-time billionaire, and a playboy who had a lot of bedpost notches. He was divorced twice. But Trump was not afraid to show who he is: The "F" word made it to his campaign rallies, mocked and ridiculed other candidates, called Ben Carson a "psycho," called JEB Bush "

There was a campaign stop at a small restaurant in Manchester, New Hampshire. An interlocutor rebuked Trump and either left or was removed from office. Trump didn't look up from the sandwich he was eating, but apologized to the rest of the diners for disturbing his lunch. It's called the common touch.

In the first Republican debate, he handed it back to Megyn Kelly bluntly and rightly: "I don't have time to be politically correct." Big applause. He took on pro-Republican lobbyists in public. She supported Angel moms and victims of illegal immigrant crimes. He did the things that other candidates found (politically) reckless.

Fourth, tens of millions of evangelicals listen to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and even Howie Carr. All of those radio personalities are rabid advocates for life and the Second Amendment. Everyone supported Donald Trump. 81% of white evangelical voters elected Trump in 2016. 60% of white Catholics voted for Trump. 42% of women voted for Trump. 29% of Latinos and Asians voted for Trump. Conservatives voted for Trump. While Trump did not lead the Republicans from the establishment, the grassroots and even many Trumpers never voted for Trump. Trumpeters always cover their noses when talking about Mitch McConnell or Lindsey Graham. Number one on his hate list is Paul Ryan, former president.

I cannot underestimate how desperate many grassroots Republicans were for a candidate other than Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, John Boeher, Mitt Romney, and John McCain. Mitt Romney stopped campaigning 14 days before the 2012 election. Trump campaigned until the wee hours of the morning on Election Day. Grassroots love, I mean I absolutely love Sarah Palin. But he knew that she would not take them to the promised land. Grassroots Republicans were crushed by NAFTA. They lose business to illegal contractors and day laborers.

Fifth, I personally know that what he says a lot about Donald Trump, he says by effect. It's not misleading, but the way things phases is basically a lie, a bold lie. Everyone knows that he is lying and accepts it as his mannerism, even his detractors. People deep down don't like being lied to. But, what they really don't like is getting angry. We have had four presidents in a row: GHW Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barrack Obama along with three Republican leaders: Bob Dole, John McCain, and Mitt Romney, along with three Democrats: Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, and John Kerry. that basically pissed us all off in America. Now, establishment Republicans (and Democrats) might revere these men (and women) for their great achievements; Most Americans (the grassroots) feel that the leadership of the last 40 years was a joke, some deep state operation, but also weak, criminal and stupid. I think all Americans are tired of endless war in the Middle East. And these politicians lied where the lie counts most: in the pocket or in the wallet.

Sixth, all the sexual harassment complaints about Donald Trump fell on deaf ears. Those voters were convinced they were voting for a man they would normally have rejected and despised, that's how firmly committed these people are to their candidate and now president. I don't think Donald Trump has sexually harassed anyone. He could have commented on their appearance (construction is a dirty and difficult business) or kissed them on the cheek, but trust me, there is a line of women eager to be with Donald Trump, the billionaire. Not so many to be with Donald Trump, the 72-year-old man. I think most understand the difference, although some would use it to propel Hillary to the presidency.

To finish, all is fair in love, war and politics. Actually. I thank James Comey. Jim Comey did the American people a great service by dumping that crap on Hillary at the last minute. The same cannot be said for the mainstream media. They have done the same American people a disservice by supporting dire presidential candidates on both sides of the aisle. Hillary lost because so many independents, including Democrats, were voting for Trump. Many union members voted for Trump. Trump was the first president of the United States to be elected for all intents and purposes as a populist. Most of his party did not campaign for him and ended the Bush political dynasty (thank goodness). Washington DC is not broken, it is corrupted. Maybe, Trump will break the suffocating bypass grip they have over the rest of us. Of all the politicians mentioned, the only person who allows me to get a good night's sleep is Trump. I'm not surprised.

Trump's 'base of support' is almost all the people who have been trained to 'hate' and fear the previous president, Barack Obama, (through a series of baseless accusations that were never true and that could never produce any fact that endorse: that is, Obama was certainly not going to 'take our arms'; he was not' planning a military coup in Texas', he was not even 'a secret Muslim' with the intention of 'instituting Sharia law'.) The 'base 'of Trump are people who have spent 30 years hearing conspiracy stories about Bill and Hillary Clinton. Trump mentions Obama and the Clintons as the bogeyman because he is j

Keep reading

Trump presents Obama and the Clintons as The Bogeyman because he's smart enough to know that he will keep these people fired up and focused on a perceived enemy and NOT paying attention to the bad work he and his administration are doing to protect the people. most. US citizens, or make any plans for their success,

Donald Trump has made isolationism a cornerstone of his administration. By severing diplomatic ties with our Allies, you are removing all loyalty and goodwill that took generations to create. Many of these countries that Trump disrespects were our steadfast partners and supported us in WWII, as well as in all the major and minor conflicts before and after. The treaties, which took years to plan and perfect, are now treated by the current president as throwaway, if something better comes along. This presiding businessman wants to apply The Art of the Deal to diplomacy, but he comes equipped with a chainsaw and butcher knife instead of a boning or filleting knife to trim the fat. Their system of tariffs and threats has mostly failed,

Instead of Donald Trump and the Secretary of Labor focusing on creating better plans for American workers to earn a living wage, they are dismantling the regulations that forced American corporations to respect our fragile environment. IF these companies do not have to keep the water and air cleaner due to environmental restrictions, they may raise or buy back shares of the company and become richer and more powerful. IF fewer American citizens have access to affordable health care, it will mean MORE wealthy Americans can stop paying higher taxes and keep that money for themselves without concern or consideration for the physical well-being of our citizens.

IF there is less tax dollars and less oversight of our public school system, headed by a poorly prepared Secretary of Education, the education received by millions of American children will not adequately train the next generations of citizens to take responsibility and they will be easier to administer. in the new order of Republican-led plutocracy with Donald Trump (or someone equally easy to influence) as the figurehead.

You could be accused that the blatant denials of climate change by the Trump administration are putting our nation, its people, its shores, and its long-term future in ultimate jeopardy. During the less than two years of the Trump administration, there has been a painful demonstration of what our future holds: worse wildfires, bigger and fiercer hurricanes, more extensive and destructive floods in some places, and catastrophic droughts in others. As our nations' natural resources are destroyed and we lose billions of dollars in value to burning or razed communities across our country, Trump scoffs at the Paris Agreement and insists that, like so much else he fears or does not fear understand, "it is all a hoax invented by the Chinese" or (perhaps,

Yes, Obama and the Clintons - these are among the favorite scapegoats used by Donald Trump to blame for his own glaring flaws as incumbent president. If he can convince enough people that "Obama and the Clintons" are to blame, that their existence is, in some way, still a "threat" to our democracy, then he can continue with the illusion (deception) that he is " (probably) the greatest president of all time. ”AND THAT, FOLKS, is WHY Donald Trump is still whipping that tired old horse two years after he won office, which he lied to and made his way to in November of 2016.

Because a candidate was the most experienced and qualified candidate in history. Someone with empathy. Someone who understands how the government works. Someone smart and humble enough to put competent people in key positions and listen to their advice. I cannot think of a potential candidate in 2020 that I would have voted against Biden from any political party.

And the other option was a furious narcissist who painted himself as a circus clown, surrounded himself with incompetents and criminals, constantly abused his position and violated his oath, who took the leadership of

Keep reading

Because a candidate was the most experienced and qualified candidate in history. Someone with empathy. Someone who understands how the government works. Someone smart and humble enough to put competent people in key positions and listen to their advice. I cannot think of a potential candidate in 2020 that I would have voted against Biden from any political party.

And we haven't even addressed the mismanagement of a pandemic and the cause of half a million deaths, or suggest that we could treat the virus with a fish tank cleaner or infusions of sunlight and Lysol. Obviously, Trump was not mentally well, and any rational person would have literally voted for anyone other than Trump in 2020.

Well, you know, Hillary is so damnable! Here's a woman who cushioned the political equivalent of a six-inch putt, losing the presidency to a reality TV star with enough baggage to blow up a dozen political careers. How not to make such an epic mistake?

Also, it's not just Trump supporters who are turning to Her Hillaryness. Anyone who hasn't read the new book, Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign, should. It is a stinging exposition of the incompetence, paranoia and lies of the woman who, we were told, was the most qualified person to ever run for office.

Keep reading

Well, you know, Hillary is so damnable! Here's a woman who cushioned the political equivalent of a six-inch putt, losing the presidency to a reality TV star with enough baggage to blow up a dozen political careers. How not to make such an epic mistake?

Also, it's not just Trump supporters who are turning to Her Hillaryness. Anyone who hasn't read the new book, Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign, should. It's a poignant exposition of the incompetence, paranoia, and lies of the woman who, we were told, was the most qualified person to run for president. Well, no. Turns out, he couldn't even put together an effective campaign team. The narrative of his candidacy, qualified, competent, who will surely be excellent in the government, is exposed as a myth.

The Nixonian adjective tends to be overused, but reading Shattered will remember it over and over again. The problem with the Hillary campaign was Hillary. Cherishing loyalty above all else, he isolated himself from criticism, bad news, in fact, from reality. Third qualifiers like Huma Abedin could and did parley slavish devotion to power and influence. The campaign became rival centers of power, at war with each other over lines of authority and access to the candidate. Only Hillary Clinton had all the strings ... and she had no idea which to pull, which to let loose, and which to cut.

So Hillary Clinton greatly deserves to be criticized, especially by the Democrats who handed her her party's nomination only to watch helplessly as she ruined it. But hey, if you prefer to back up your post-election complaints and excuses now, that's fine by me.

I was a ward leader for the local Democrats. My job was to knock on every registered Democrat's door in my neighborhood and encourage them to vote. I did this twice before the election and had a lot of interesting conversations with the Democrats. My neighborhood is 60% Democratic.

My own experience is that I voted for the Green Party candidate in each of the previous elections, but I felt, this time, that Trump was an existential threat to my country and, although I would have preferred Bernie, it was important that Clinton beat him to Trump. I volunteered.

The first thing I noticed was that there was no Clin

Keep reading

I was a ward leader for the local Democrats. My job was to knock on every registered Democrat's door in my neighborhood and encourage them to vote. I did this twice before the election and had a lot of interesting conversations with the Democrats. My neighborhood is 60% Democratic.

My own experience is that I voted for the Green Party candidate in each of the previous elections, but I felt, this time, that Trump was an existential threat to my country and, although I would have preferred Bernie, it was important that Clinton beat him to Trump. I volunteered.

The first thing I noticed was that there was no Clinton nonsense; no buttons, no signs in the garden, nothing like a handout. They told me that the Clinton campaign had not made such a thing available in the state of Oregon.

I had many friendly conversations with the Democrats in the neighborhood and almost all of them said that they would vote for Clinton because they are afraid of Trump and that they would not vote or vote for someone else otherwise.

Clinton had these slogans like "fighting for us" and "stronger together" which were supposed to be the counterbalance to Trump's very consistent "Make American Great Again." Then we have Trump's "Crooked Hillary" to which Clinton responded that Trump is a "loose cannon." All of these things are just plain stupid.

We are in a situation where the world is threatened by the environmental and economic catastrophe of global warming. We were in a situation where millions of people lost their homes during the financial collapse of 2007-2008 and continued to suffer throughout the Obama administration and the strongest thing that came out of Clinton's mouth is "continuing the progress that we have made under President Obama". What's that?!

Personally, I cringed every time Clinton repeated one of his stupid slogans. No, I'm not with her. I voted against Trump. That's why Clinton lost because a campaign message that is basically I'm not him is not enough.

Colin Powell said Clinton will be defeated by her own arrogance. I think he is the closest to anyone to understand why Clinton lost. Podesta's emails show that Clinton's staff believed that she could have resolved the entire email server controversy if she had reacted in a timely manner, but ignored what became one of the big controversies used to undermine her. credibility. Clinton's staff was incredulous about it. Why didn't you do something about it? She ignored him out of arrogance.

The emails also show, and Donna Brazile's book contributes to this, as do the arguments in court by DNC attorneys, that the Clinton campaign colluded with the DNC to defeat Sanders. Clinton didn't bother to put this in her book. He also didn't put the unethical relationship he had with members of the press, including Donna Brazile, which he used to defeat Sanders. However, he defeated Sanders in an unfair and unethical collaboration believing he was better able to run for president against a populist like Trump. He is brain dead. Did you have to cheat to win and yet are you the most qualified? It was doomed and now we have Trump. In fact, I'm a little embarrassed that I tried to get the vote out of him.

What if Obama wasn't as good a president as many seem to claim?

Let me point out that when he was elected, Obama was supposed to be the opposite of George W. Bush.

Instead, we saw a president who:

  1. Increased inequality and, in many cases, signed legislation that increased inequality.
  2. He had a cabinet selected by Citigroup.
  3. He refused to go after Wall Street executives over the 2008 crash.
  4. He didn't reinstall Glass-Steagall or anything but Dodd-Frank happened, which overlooked too many problems.
  5. He chose to write a debilitating healthcare system that even today bitterly divides Americans nicknamed Obamacare,
Keep reading

What if Obama wasn't as good a president as many seem to claim?

Let me point out that when he was elected, Obama was supposed to be the opposite of George W. Bush.

Instead, we saw a president who:

  1. Increased inequality and, in many cases, signed legislation that increased inequality.
  2. He had a cabinet selected by Citigroup.
  3. He refused to go after Wall Street executives over the 2008 crash.
  4. He didn't reinstall Glass-Steagall or anything but Dodd-Frank happened, which overlooked too many problems.
  5. He chose to write a debilitating healthcare system that even today bitterly divides Americans nicknamed Obamacare, rather than attempting to copy, say, the Canadian healthcare system or at least attempting to implement a serious public option.
  6. They largely continued Bush's wars and started new ones, in Libya, for example, while "breaking out" in Afghanistan.
  7. It did not address Washington's fundamental problem, which is political corruption.
  8. He had a pro-austerity budget and made no attempt after the first partial stimulus.
  9. He waged an unprecedented war against whistleblowers.
  10. It did not mobilize its base in an attempt to tackle the very problems it had to solve. He could have used his base to try to outmaneuver an obstructionist Republican. There was a lot of goodwill after his election. He chose to throw it away.

I don't think Obama is well regarded. In fact, I suspect they will compare him to James Buchanan, who was facing a deep crisis and making a bad situation worse.

There is a reason why Bernie Sanders gained such popularity. It was because Obama had failed to achieve the Change we pushed so hard in 2008. There is a reason why Clinton's attempt to claim that she was Obama's third term did not generate enthusiasm.

Combine that with Clinton's poor campaign skills and the Democratic National Committee's unethical sabotage of Bernie Sanders, then you have Trump.

Is this how people decide the candidates? So strange.

"You didn't like Obama from the beginning." Standard group bias? You can't even be objective when it comes to your nation.

"He spoke the same thing in speech after speech, then it got boring." I wonder if he can discuss the actual politics and the content of the speeches. 'Boring' indeed.

Again more prejudice about Hillary. And are you comparing her to Sarah Palin? Democrats don't like him for about 100 reasons. What are your reasons for hating Hillary? I don't think you have any. Here there is no equivalence. You just slim

Keep reading

Is this how people decide the candidates? So strange.

"You didn't like Obama from the beginning." Standard group bias? You can't even be objective when it comes to your nation.

"He spoke the same thing in speech after speech, then it got boring." I wonder if he can discuss the actual politics and the content of the speeches. 'Boring' indeed.

Again more prejudice about Hillary. And are you comparing her to Sarah Palin? Democrats don't like him for about 100 reasons. What are your reasons for hating Hillary? I don't think you have any. Here there is no equivalence. You think you hate her because you're an indoctrinated member of the Republican Party and you're supposed to. Nowhere in the descriptions has he mentioned anything that worries him. He is buying the rhetoric and seems to think it is a fact that Obama was bad for the country. And that Hillary will be bad for the country. For no other reason than they are Democrats? 'You are extremely worried' indeed. And I doubt you can tell me why. And you used 'literally' wrong.

All this just because you're a Republican. This is the strangest phenomenon I have ever encountered. Nationalism, racial identities, religious identities are absolute and immutable, there is myopia and a certain inability to see the other sides. But this is 'politics and ideological identity', and you're essentially being an indoctrinated, unthinking sheep in this prejudiced herd of your group. This is not how you are supposed to operate. Try to come up with some ideas of your own, if you can, and see who yours align with. This is how you are supposed to choose a side. Jesus.

"At least she's pretty" sums it up about you, I think. Also, there is a lack of thought here. Hillary is 67 years old. Sarah is 51 years old. Hillary looked good when she was younger. Sarah never looked as good as ever.

Note: I am not a Democrat or a Republican because I am not even an American. But I had to answer and mention all this. Because it is unsettling.

The same reason everyone else lost to Barack Obama. Are you kidding? Young, personable, charismatic, with great promise, excellent speaker, catchy posters, incredibly credible candidate for first black president, which in itself was an event that must have passed a long time. It was refreshing, populist, idyllic, and charming at the same time. I don't want to put too much weight on race here, but it's an inexhaustible source of public image for a country fed up with having old, uncomfortable whites running it, especially after Bush.

I didn't even vote for the guy, but I can acknowledge the utter futility of trying to oppose an image as strong as O

Keep reading

The same reason everyone else lost to Barack Obama. Are you kidding? Young, personable, charismatic, with great promise, excellent speaker, catchy posters, incredibly credible candidate for first black president, which in itself was an event that must have passed a long time. It was refreshing, populist, idyllic, and charming at the same time. I don't want to put too much weight on race here, but it's an inexhaustible source of public image for a country fed up with having old, uncomfortable whites running it, especially after Bush.

I didn't even vote for the guy, but I can acknowledge the utter futility of trying to oppose an image as strong as Obama's. You would think that Hilary would be a credible candidate to run against him for somewhat similar reasons, but the idea of ​​an "inherited" or "dynastic" candidate is radically unappealing at the moment, and her rigid demeanor is more like the candidates of the last. not. The only result that could have been a loss. The only thing that surprises me is that people might be surprised.

A key, and unfortunate, difference is probably in foreign policy, and in the area I'm most informed (and most sensitive) about: American policy toward the Middle East.

Mrs. Clinton has made it very clear that she intends to pursue a more aggressive strategy in Syria and also repair the relationship between the United States and its "key allies" in the region, namely Saudi Arabia and Israel. It also identifies Iran as the main enemy of the United States in the region (in my opinion, a serious miscalculation that has hurt both countries for a long time).

This results in further confrontation with Russia and Iran, first in Syria and th

Keep reading

A key, and unfortunate, difference is probably in foreign policy, and in the area I'm most informed (and most sensitive) about: American policy toward the Middle East.

Mrs. Clinton has made it very clear that she intends to pursue a more aggressive strategy in Syria and also repair the relationship between the United States and its "key allies" in the region, namely Saudi Arabia and Israel. It also identifies Iran as the main enemy of the United States in the region (in my opinion, a serious miscalculation that has hurt both countries for a long time).

This translates into further confrontation with Russia and Iran, first in Syria and then directly. There will be even less hope in the Palestinian peace process (unless Mrs. Clinton "swaps" the pressure on Iran by a few points for the Palestinians), and the re-ignition of the slowly healing gap between Iran and the United States. I hope the Clinton administration will take us back (before the second Bush) in ME politics, to the times of "liberal hegemony" where the United States sprinkles "democracy" on its adversaries (and promotes regime change), while doing a blind eye to serious crimes committed by their allies. In this sense, we will miss Obama very much. Not that his strategy was perfect,

In particular, I hope that Iran will be given less slack in terms of reaping the (already weak) benefits of the nuclear deal, and more unilateral sanctions against Iran. In such a case, the positive effects of the nuclear deal will quickly wear off (on both sides) and, within Iran, this will hurt proponents of an "open" approach to the west. Especially since Iran is possibly in its most important transition in decades (a new supreme leader), this will carry a serious risk to both Iranian and American interests in the region.

I sincerely hope that Mrs. Clinton will change her philosophy and approach once elected president, as people say she is a great listener. However, it will matter a lot who listens: Netanyahu and Prince Muhammad Bin Salman will be of no use.

Other Guides:


GET SPECIAL OFFER FROM OUR PARTNER.