Who is better president, Obama or Trump?

Updated on : December 3, 2021 by Imogen Macdonald



Who is better president, Obama or Trump?

From Christopher Black's answer to Speaking Completely Objectively, is Trump a good president based only on what he's done in office?

Here's a graph (from the Labor Department) of total private sector employment in the US, including all of Trump's most recent numbers as of April 2019, with all axis labels removed. At what point do you think the Trump Jobs and Tax Cuts Act of 2017 was passed, signaling a shift from Barack Obama's "terrible policies" to the new era in which the "greater producer of jobs than God created "began to wave his" magic wand "? "Keep your finger there. Then read on.

Altho

Keep reading

From Christopher Black's answer to Speaking Completely Objectively, is Trump a good president based only on what he's done in office?

Here's a graph (from the Labor Department) of total private sector employment in the US, including all of Trump's most recent numbers as of April 2019, with all axis labels removed. At what point do you think the Trump Jobs and Tax Cuts Act of 2017 was passed, signaling a shift from Barack Obama's "terrible policies" to the new era in which the "greater producer of jobs than God created "began to wave his" magic wand "? "Keep your finger there. Then read on.

Although many critics of Trump focus on his emotional immaturity and ethical / legal struggles, I would like to focus on the things that Trump himself claims are his greatest strengths: his economic leadership and his bargaining skills.

I run my own business and I have quite a few friends and family who have run businesses, some large and some small. (Mine is small). The hope of many business owners like me, and of our millions of workers, was that Trump would put American businesses on an even stronger path than the "Obama track record." It would reverse our trade deficit, balance the budget, boost GDP, create an infrastructure for prosperity, and be the world's biggest job creator.

* Many say that cutting regulations is also important. But only if it gives your particular business a competitive advantage. Oil companies hate regulations that prevent drilling or encourage fuel-efficient cars, but they love those that prevent the development of wind or solar farms. The "all regulations are bad" mantra makes as much sense as the Major League Baseball commissioner saying he will "remove two rules for every new one" instead of encouraging teams to follow the rules. Sure, get rid of inefficient or unfair regulations, but smart regulations can fuel growth if implemented correctly. Most importantly, regulations are our main instrument of corporate responsibility. In summary, "

When evaluating a president's performance as a "national CEO," the question is not so much "how strong is the economy right now?" (Supporters will take credit or blame to make their side look good) but rather "how is the president dealing with current crises and laying the groundwork for future prosperity?" But of course we can only look at the data in hindsight. Better to look at them in context, to move beyond partisan bragging and talking points. Here are the numbers:

From the US Bureau of Labor Statistics

Where does the "Trump economic miracle" appear to have occurred? Are there clear tipping points in the data indicating that Trump's "magic wand" has cast its spell? Under Trump, was the budget deficit reduced? Did the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act cause real wages to rise, hiring to accelerate, or to accelerate GDP? Did he win the trade war?

When you look at the numbers, it's clear that Trump's performance is mediocre or, at best, slightly below average. The carefully selected data that he and his cheerleaders released, when put into context, clearly does not support his claim that he is a business genius who "turned around a disaster he inherited."

In fact, the data shows just the opposite. It appears that Trump inherited an economy with decent momentum, even more astonishing after the "Great Recession" of 2007-2009. (In Obama's second term, GDP growth averaged + 2.2% per year, unspectacular, but remarkably stable and much better than economists had predicted after the Great Recession, and well above the rate. average GDP growth of 1.58% from the post-depression "golden era" of 1945-1960.) Take the employment chart at the bottom, which is the first graph put into context. jobs God created, "we'd see a turning point on the chart somewhere in Trump's first two years. In fact, There is an incredibly strong inflection point in this graph, but sadly it coincides almost perfectly with the day Barack Obama signed the Recovery Act in February 2009, weeks after taking office. (To be fair, much of the shift in employment trends can also be attributed to the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) approved by Bush in October 2008 and supported by both presidential candidates, John McCain and Barack Obama. Sen. Hillary Clinton also Bernie Sanders did not. TARP was the main driver of huge budget deficits in 2009-2012, but it obviously managed to stem the trend of huge job losses, which was a much bigger problem.) non-government jobs, so there is no room for the "bigger government" counterargument. The unemployment rate has continued to decline under Trump, but only because the "Obama line" has continued.

He can be forgiven for suspecting that the latest graphic was faked, or at least rigged, to make Obama look good. After all, if Obama's employment numbers were so good, with a classic turning point early in his term, followed by a rocket trajectory, why wasn't he constantly bragging about it? (It doesn't matter. We all know the answer to that question.) If you doubt the numbers, check them out. Go to the US Department of Labor Statistics website (BLS Tools), go to the "Employment" section, click "Data Finder", check "All employees, thousands, private total, seasonally adjusted", do the range 2004 to 2019, download the Excel data (.xlsx) and create your own line chart.

But what about the Dow and GDP? Business leaders and investors want to see real changes in productivity and growth. As I write this, Trump has just started his twenty-seventh month in office, 24 of which had full control of the three branches of government, a "blank check" for Republicans, which is plenty of time for his policies economic benefits take effect. The Dow has gained + 34.2% in that time. That's great compared to the -22.1% change in Bush's 27th month, but average compared to Obama's + 60.1% growth at this point in his presidency. Trump boasted a lot about the Dow's 81 all-time highs during his first two years in office, but since the Dow grows at a fairly constant rate of 6 to 8% per year without recession, all-time highs are not unusual. By comparison, after pulling the country out of the Great Recession in his first term, Obama saw 91 all-time highs in the first two years of his second term. Trump has touted the 3% GDP growth in 2018 as "unprecedented," but this is not even close to the truth, as the graph indicates. He seems almost anemic compared to Clinton's eight years. Even George W. Bush had TWO years of GDP growth in excess of 3%, and he had the worst economic performance of any president since Hoover. , but this is not even close to the truth, as the graph indicates. He seems almost anemic compared to Clinton's eight years. Even George W. Bush had TWO years of GDP growth in excess of 3%, and he had the worst economic performance of any president since Hoover. , but this is not even close to the truth, as the graph indicates. He seems almost anemic compared to Clinton's eight years. Even George W. Bush had TWO years of GDP growth in excess of 3%, and he had the worst economic performance of any president since Hoover.

It is interesting to compare Trump's economic performance to that of Bill Clinton, as Trump spends a lot of time trashing the Clintons and spreading conspiracy theories about them and many others on his "enemy list." Take your favorite metric (GDP growth, stock market performance, budget deficit, productivity growth, earnings growth, job creation, trade balance) and compare Trump's performance to Clinton's at equal time intervals. . It is enlightening to do your own analysis and free yourself from the propaganda that comes from the corporate media and the White House. And it's easy. Use BLS Tools, BEA Data, or any other objective data site. (Just stay away from the White House communications team or any politically biased media source, like CNN or Fox.) Based on the data alone, who would you say is a great "business leader"? It's a very different story outside of Trump's Twitter bubble. If you don't have time, you can check out Bloomberg's comprehensive 14-point analysis of economic data for every US president since Jimmy Carter. (He started this "presidential index" before Trump took office, so they are not selecting data for or against Trump.) At the end of January, Trump ranked sixth among the 7 presidents in terms of economic performance, just ahead of George W. Bush. Even Carter is ahead of Trump. Clinton is the first, followed by Barack Obama, followed by Ronald Reagan. (He started this "presidential index" before Trump took office, so they are not selecting data for or against Trump.) At the end of January, Trump ranked sixth among the 7 presidents in terms of economic performance, just ahead of George W. Bush. Even Carter is ahead of Trump. Clinton is first, followed by Barack Obama, followed by Ronald Reagan. (He started this "presidential index" before Trump took office, so they are not selecting data for or against Trump). At the end of January, Trump ranked sixth among the 7 presidents in terms of economic performance, just ahead of George W. Bush. Even Carter is ahead of Trump. Clinton is the first, followed by Barack Obama,

According to a World Bank economist, the Trump administration is following almost precisely the policies of the George W. Bush administration: tax cuts, increased spending, and deregulation, which led to the very conditions that produced the Great Recession. The numbers and trends are eerily similar.

Perhaps we shouldn't be so surprised, given that Trump's personal and corporate return on investment (ROI) has been much weaker than, in fact, less than 1/3 the strength of a passive investment in the S&P 500. In others In other words, Trump hasn't provided investors with any legitimate reason to invest in him instead of the cheapest generic stock fund. However, recently his net worth has certainly risen as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which according to various analyzes has brought the Trump family between $ 22.5 million and $ 1.1 billion, mostly through massive cuts. inheritance tax. This is a huge benefit only for the children of billionaires. Most conservative supporters of free market capitalism, like myself,

Trump's productive ROI is probably so low because, unlike self-made billionaires, he never had to impress potential investors. When all your money is inherited (apparently, Trump started receiving his $ 480 million inheritance when he was only 3 years old), he doesn't need a stellar business model. Of course, being an heir does not automatically disqualify someone from being a great business leader. John D. Rockefeller, Jr. and Thomas Watson, Jr. also inherited great companies and enormous wealth from their parents, but they also provided strong leadership for their companies and became great philanthropists. However, it does not appear that Trump is on the same path,

Many of the habits Trump acquired as a private chief executive are problematic when projected nationally. It is alarming that Trump is working so hard to hide his taxes and make his finances above the law (and even more alarming that the Senate and the courts are letting him get away with it). Strong companies don't hide their numbers unless they're cooking the books. It's an even worse sign that no US bank has been willing to lend Trump money for more than a decade, and that the only bank that has financed Trump (Deutsche Bank) is a known epicenter of international money laundering. (A disreputable bank could lend money to someone who does not repay their loans because it gives them something more valuable. One theory is that, in this case,

But maybe Trump just isn't a numbers guy. Great CEOs can have different styles. Sometimes vision and inspiration are better keys to long-term success than a simple laser focus on profits and growth. If you can attract and inspire entrepreneurs now, perhaps you can ensure future prosperity. Unfortunately, Trump seems to have a hard time getting America's top CEOs to accept his leadership on his own Business Advisory Council. Apparently he doesn't like to share the spotlight.

As a result, it does not appear to attract and retain the best people or provide a solid guide for business leaders. Your advisers appear to be chosen because you saw them on television, rather than because they have substantial experience. So far, his predictions have been more of a Trumpian exaggeration, rather than the reliable estimates of the economic future that business leaders need to make capital investment and hiring decisions.

Perhaps most importantly, his view of the nation is historically bleak. "Keep foreigners out," "my enemies are losers," "everyone's after me," "bring coal," and "no to collusion" are not very inspiring shouts of protest for American workers and businessmen. Trump does not lead on the economic issues that concern voters most, such as long-term financial stability (as opposed to more reckless debt); a 21st century data and transportation infrastructure, a world-class affordable healthcare system, prosperity in the face of climate change, ensuring worker safety in the face of accelerating automation and expanding free trade (instead of destroying alliances and building walls ).

One of Trump's biggest campaign promises was to "totally fix" the "disastrous trade imbalance" that was "costing us trillions of dollars" and that his predecessors couldn't handle because they were too "weak and stupid." (Most economists and CEOs disagree that trade deficits are a bad thing, but let's go with Trump on this one.) In January 2018, Trump launched his tariff war (which exactly 0 of 60 economists polled by Reuters agreed would "benefit the US economy") that he promised would be "so quick and easy to win." It was not. In fact, it is much worse than that. It raised our 2018 trade deficit to an all-time high. (Before Trump took office, the worst monthly trade deficit of all time was $ 76 billion in July 2008, in the depths of the Great Recession. Under Trump's "tariff war," that record has been broken FIVE TIMES). In July 2018, Trump had to pay farmers $ 12 billion from the United States Treasury to make up for lost income. He's an impressive failure in all respects, which probably explains why he's not tweeting much about it anymore. Trump had to pay farmers $ 12 billion from the United States Treasury to make up for the loss of income. He's an impressive failure in all respects, which probably explains why he's not tweeting much about it anymore. Trump had to pay farmers $ 12 billion from the United States Treasury to make up for the loss of income. He's an impressive failure in all respects, which probably explains why he's not tweeting much about it anymore.

Trump also promised to be a "great negotiator," as his television character suggested. Trump is right (in my opinion) that Chinese currency manipulation, protectionism, and intellectual piracy are real problems for world markets, and the United States should lead the fight against them. But a negotiator needs a plan, a backbone, a steady hand, and the skills to maximize leverage. A smart negotiator would have kept us in the TPP (rather than ditch it because ... umm, globalism?) So that the US would have a much stronger leverage position against China. Instead, Trump gave control of Asian markets to China and started a weak, stupid, and unnecessarily expensive tariff war. It's like quitting the game and then trying " of Trump with contempt and regard the United States as less of a trusted partner. Those who work closely with him have noted that he has an extraordinarily fragile ego and a pathetically short temperament and attention span. You are not doing your homework and are therefore ill-prepared in the negotiations to apply adequate leverage or respond nimbly to setbacks. He's too susceptible to flattery, so it's easy for opponents to take advantage of him. Given that he seems to take pride in breaking not only the contracts he signs with his business partners, but also the treaties signed by his predecessors, it is no wonder that our adversaries and friends regard Trump's "agreements" with contempt and regard the United States as least trusted partner. Those who work closely with him have noted that he has an extraordinarily fragile ego and a pathetically short temperament and attention span. You are not doing your homework and are therefore ill-prepared in the negotiations to apply adequate leverage or respond nimbly to setbacks. He's too susceptible to flattery, so it's easy for opponents to take advantage of him. Given that he seems to take pride in breaking not only the contracts he signs with his business partners, but also the treaties signed by his predecessors, it is no wonder that our adversaries and friends regard Trump's "agreements" with contempt and regard the United States as least trusted partner. He does not do his homework and therefore you are ill-prepared in the negotiations to apply adequate leverage or respond quickly to setbacks. He's too susceptible to flattery, so it's easy for opponents to take advantage of him. Given that he seems to take pride in breaking not only the contracts he signs with his business partners, but also the treaties signed by his predecessors, it is no wonder that our adversaries and friends regard Trump's "agreements" with contempt and regard the United States as least trusted partner. You are not doing your homework and are therefore ill-prepared in the negotiations to apply adequate leverage or respond nimbly to setbacks. He's too susceptible to flattery, so it's easy for opponents to take advantage of him.

Trump over-sells and underperforms. It tends to spin its deals and policies as "great victories for the United States," but on closer inspection (eg, Korea, China, Iran, the Paris Accords, and the TPP) they appear to be poorly developed plans that do little or nothing. any. to make America great.

It appears that Trump was lying when he said he had a beautiful plan to replace Obamacare, and the "Infrastructure Week" that Trump has repeatedly promised during his first two years in office (including this week again) has become a cruel meme. joke on the internet. .

Top business leaders understand the value of promotion and even the "show," but only when accompanied by great strategy and hard work to develop the product. So far, Trump doesn't seem to have a great economic product or a great strategy. Many of us were willing to give it a try, but at this point it should come as no surprise that the Trump White House is following the dismal trajectories of Trump Airlines, Trump University, Trump Steaks, Trump Mortgage, and Trump Taj Majal. All glitter, no substance and too much fraud. We can only hope it doesn't bankrupt America like those companies.

The ultimate measure of any president who considers himself a “national brand leader” is the Anholt-GfK Roper Nation Brands index. Since Trump took office, America has fallen behind all of our major competitors for the first time since George W. Bush left office. This means less influence, less investment, less credibility, and less power.

If a CEO of a Fortune 500 company had this kind of record after 2 years (by the way, we're still in sixth place for 2018), the board would almost certainly fire him. Trump's inability to keep the United States at the top of the National Brand Index hurts all American companies that depend on imports, exports, foreign sales, or foreign investment, which is almost all of them.

Business leaders would also love for Trump to control the crushing national debt, because it places severe limits on our ability to grow in the future and to deal effectively with any recession or recession. (Debt control, in theory at least, is why so many entrepreneurs are Republicans in the first place.) Unfortunately, Trump is quickly heading in the opposite direction. You are racking up record debt, but building very little prosperity-creating infrastructure.

In fact, the deficit problem is even worse for Trump than the graph above indicates. The Congressional Budget Office predicts that the 2019 deficit will exceed $ 900 billion and exceed $ 1 trillion for every year after 2022. It's one thing to run budget deficits during a recession to offset the collapse in global demand (such as in World War II, when American deficit spending helped pull us out of the Great Depression, or in 2009, when drastic deficit spending was needed to stop massive job losses), but in times of relative prosperity, it's reckless and puts future prosperity at risk. The deficit-to-GDP ratio, perhaps the most important statistic for economic conservatives, is projected to be 4.6% in 2019, the first time in history that it has been so high when we are not in the middle of a recession or its immediate situation. aftermath. This ratio is also known as the "inactive rate" because it indicates the nation's inability or unwillingness to pay its bills. Any honest conservative would be alarmed if this happened with the Democrats, and should be at least equally alarmed that it is happening with Trump.

Trump appears to be more interested in pressuring the Fed to win its numbers in the short term than in planning for long-term prosperity. To safeguard economic stability, the Fed must remain free from political interference. Trump's nominations of Herman Cain and Stephen Moore to the Fed show that he prefers political cheerleaders to qualified economic leaders, or that qualified candidates do not want to work with his administration.

This is the kind of destabilizing behavior that creates bubbles and crashes.

While most CEOs I know are Republicans, many admit (grudgingly) that Obama did a much better job promoting the American brand, strengthening business relationships with other nations, and maintaining the stability of governance that companies need to grow. , building infrastructure. And despite some political disagreements (mainly over particular trade deals and domestic spending), he pulled us out of a deep recession with a firm hand, all while Trump was attacking him from Trump Tower. By all relevant accounts, Trump doesn't seem to know as much as he does about fiscal policy, trade policy, budgeting, branding, or, more surprisingly, negotiation.

Now that he is in office, we can see how he operates and we are not impressed. Fortunately, most American corporations do not operate "Trump-style."

Trump, without competition.

People credit Obama for changing the economy when he probably would have changed anyway.

Many people seem to believe that Obama treated everyone kindly, but they ignore many of the things he did.

Under Obama, America was involved in the removal of a couple of leaders from different countries (I thought we didn't like other nations trying to influence our elections? However, Obama used TAXPAYER dollars to try to get rid of Netanyahu). He helped overthrow Gaddafi and the leader of Egypt, and instead the Muslim Brotherhood came to power.

Keep reading

Trump, without competition.

People credit Obama for changing the economy when he probably would have changed anyway.

Many people seem to believe that Obama treated everyone kindly, but they ignore many of the things he did.

Under Obama, America was involved in the removal of a couple of leaders from different countries (I thought we didn't like other nations trying to influence our elections? However, Obama used TAXPAYER dollars to try to get rid of Netanyahu). He helped overthrow Gaddafi and the leader of Egypt, and instead the Muslim Brotherhood came to power.

Under Obama, Operation Fast and Furious allowed weapons to enter Mexico illegally under the assumption that they would be traced. Guess what, most of them were lost and turned out to be used as weapons in mass executions of Mexicans by drug cartels. That's a good thing Obama did, huh? (sarcasm)

Under Obama, racial tensions were sent back to the 1960s because everything revolved around race; This didn't start with Trump (I think it's gotten worse with him though, but mostly thanks to the Democrats and the media). He divided us in every way he could, by race, gender, sexual orientation, etc. Whatever, it did.

Under Obama, the IRS targeted conservative 501 (3) (c) nonprofits, making it difficult for them to obtain tax-exempt status when left-wing nonprofits had no problem.

Obama also said things without understanding what he was talking about, just like Trump does, but for Obama it was "Cambridge police acted stupid" when Cambridge police did what they were supposed to do, and did you ever see his 17 minute response? to a yes / no question when a woman asked if her health care bill would raise taxes on the middle class. Yes, it was not "presidential". I was stumbling over his words and it was nothing fancy (no teleprompter). Just because someone can read from a teleprompter doesn't mean they are a good president. Just because someone is good at writing their words doesn't make them a good president.

Obama had a couple of US citizens murdered in Yemen without due process and spied on the Associated Press. I could go on.

Trump isn't a great president, either, and I didn't vote for him, but just because someone is "presidential" doesn't mean they're a good president. People seem to like dog and pony shows more than being a good president. If the media treated Trump like they did Obama, then perhaps everyone would think Trump was a good president, but they couldn't have treated Obama the same way, even though there was a lot of ammunition. Like “This is my last pick. After my election I have more flexibility. ”This would be in all the news if Trump said this to someone from Russia.

I voted for Obama both times because I was not informed about what was happening in the real world rather than what was being said on television, newspapers, social media, etc. Midway through Obama's second term, I discovered Mark Levine, Ben Shapiro, and Glen Beck. I have always been an objective person, I always try to weigh the available evidence to make the best decision. After hearing so many things from these 3 aforementioned sources that went against what was being said elsewhere… I started doing my own research. (At times it was very difficult to find the supporting evidence because the search engine

Keep reading

I voted for Obama both times because I was not informed about what was happening in the real world rather than what was being said on television, newspapers, social media, etc. Midway through Obama's second term, I discovered Mark Levine, Ben Shapiro, and Glen Beck. I have always been an objective person, I always try to weigh the available evidence to make the best decision. After hearing so many things from these 3 aforementioned sources that went against what was being said elsewhere… I started doing my own research. (At times it was very difficult to find the supporting evidence because the search engines intentionally bury anything that goes against the left-wing programmers on Google, Facebook, Twitter and others) In the end, I discovered that Obama was not as benevolent as the media. portraying it as. In fact, it was probably the most damaging POTUS since Wilson. I promised not to go to the 2016 elections "without education." I did my own research to find that while Hillary was at the State Department, Bill was making $ 4 million dollar speeches for questionable people. So the destruction of evidence while his illegal server was being investigated was enough to know what it was about. I also did research on the Republican candidates. (I have always been an independent) I decided that Ted Cruz was my candidate because he is a constitutional scholar, and I did not find unethical activities related to him. When Trump removed Cruz from the Republican nomination, I was not happy. I never really liked Trump. He was a rich, arrogant and privileged idiot. I ended up not even voting. Now, after reflecting on how much my life has improved with a higher paying job, my retirement money has grown faster in the last 2 years than the entire time Obama was in office, people are not afraid to spend money Again, terrorists are being eliminated, Americans are now exporting energy instead of relying on foreign energy imports, and illegal immigration is being tackled. I still think Trump is a rich, arrogant jerk ... but that doesn't matter. I don't care what it is in his personal life, when he puts on the POTUS hat he takes care of the country better than anyone in a long, long time. The Russian collusion hoax and this Adam Schiff circus have screamed that Trump is the best man for the job.

It would be unfair to compare them head to head, at this point. One had eight years in office, which gave him time to accomplish many things, while the other had less than 2 years in office and did not have long to accomplish much of something substantive.

With that being said, let's try to compare them just to answer your question.

Barack Obama campaign promises

  1. Hope and change. I'll give you that. Many people expected things to change, and they did. But, I'm not so sure that many of them liked all the change they got.
  2. Some form of medical care to cover the uninsured while allo
Keep reading

It would be unfair to compare them head to head, at this point. One had eight years in office, which gave him time to accomplish many things, while the other had less than 2 years in office and did not have long to accomplish much of something substantive.

With that being said, let's try to compare them just to answer your question.

Barack Obama campaign promises

  1. Hope and change. I'll give you that. Many people expected things to change, and they did. But, I'm not so sure that many of them liked all the change they got.
  2. Some form of health care to cover the uninsured, while allowing people who have health care plans to keep the plans they like while reducing health care costs. I have to give him a demerit on this. In the end, almost as many people were uninsured as before, only there was a new group of insured people and some newly uninsured people, while many people were forced to abandon the plans they liked and the costs of almost EVERYONE increased exponentially. .
  3. He would end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and stop Bush's "Nation Building" policy. I have to give him a demerit on this one too. While the Iraqi war ended under his command, it was done on a schedule set by the Bush Administration. Afghanistan is still being fought and we have expanded our military aggression to other Middle Eastern nations, and the Obama administration killed more people with drones than the Bush administration. The "Arab Spring" was a failure, nation-building in Egypt and Libya, it brought us DISASTERS in both countries, including the first American ambassador to be assassinated on foreign soil in a long time. Egypt has finally come largely under control, but look at the mess in Syria, Lebanon, and across the Middle East, to see Obama's failures.
  4. He promised to move the US embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem (as promised by several of his predecessors). It never happened in 8 years under his command.
  5. Restore the economy. We never saw 2 consecutive quarters of> 4% GDP growth, so no, he failed at this too.
  6. He promised to unite a divided country. We were more divided on racial, ethnic, gender and religious grounds when he left office than when he took office. Fail!

Now, let's see what Trump has done to deliver on HIS promises.

  1. Build the wall. Even with the blockade of Congress, it is happening. Slowly, but it is happening. Still, I will NOT count that as a compliment.
  2. Drain the swamp. Not met, but we sure know A LOT more about the so-called "Deep State" and conspiracies within the government, which would be one of the first steps. Identifying the problem. It has not yet been fulfilled
  3. Tax cuts. Well, he has me there. We saw the passage of the biggest tax cut in a long time.
  4. He also promised to move the Israeli embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Done!
  5. He promised to recover jobs and reduce unemployment. We are currently at the HIGHEST labor participation rate in recorded history. Unemployment is the lowest since Nixon took office. Done!
  6. Keystone XL Pipeline. Done!
  7. He promised to rebuild the army, and it is being done.
  8. He promised to renegotiate bad trade deals. NAFTA is gone, and as a result, we have a better deal.
  9. He promised to get us out of the Paris Accords. Done!
  10. He promised to scrap the terrible Iranian nuclear deal. Done!
  11. He promised to work to bring peace to the Korean peninsula. He hasn't done it yet, but he's accomplished more than anyone in 65 years.

So, you see, it really is unfair to compare them. Obama was 8 years old and managed to do very little, other than appease his fellow union members. Trump hasn't even reached the 2-year mark, so he hasn't had much time to accomplish anything… ..

I think the question (with its categorization "Evidence") and the unanimity of the answers say more than anything in this thread.

Let's think about this rationally. Donald Trump is president (sorry to any of you who still deny this fact). Almost 63 million people voted for him. So where are all these people? Was it all a hoax? They do not exist?

Well, actually, I'm friends with a lot of them, and from what I see, most of them are pretty happy with Trump. But they're not talking about it because, well, who's listening? Who cares about your worries? P.

Keep reading

I think the question (with its categorization "Evidence") and the unanimity of the answers say more than anything in this thread.

Let's think about this rationally. Donald Trump is president (sorry to any of you who still deny this fact). Almost 63 million people voted for him. So where are all these people? Was it all a hoax? They do not exist?

Well, actually, I'm friends with a lot of them, and from what I see, most of them are pretty happy with Trump. But they're not talking about it because, well, who's listening? Who cares about your worries? From what I can see every time they do it, they are branded as racist, sexist, or just plain idiots. So they keep quiet, until the day people are forced to listen to them: Election Day.

So I'll say it for them. Even though I didn't vote for either, I preferred Trump to Clinton, I'm glad he won, I prefer him to Obama, and since then everything I've seen has only reinforced this opinion. Why?

Take a look at this couple of images and you will get my answer:

(To point out, I have not verified the veracity of these, but as often as I have seen both sentiments expressed, I see no solid reason to doubt them. And this was after the constant refrain during the Bush administration that "Dissent is patriotic. "

I'm glad Trump does it for one and only one reason, and that is that at least as long as he (and as far as I know, any Republican and just any Republican) is president, then the principle that it is ethical to challenge authority when your conscience so dictates it will remain alive. There is not a single thing anyone says about reacting to Trump that is de facto invalid for Obama, Clinton, Sanders or anyone on the left.

Some might argue, of course, that they are not questioning the idea of ​​dissent, simply saying that one is more worthy of it than the other. That is fairer. And I still disagree. I think Obama's record as president was atrocious, and I don't even think he's the "classy" man that his supporters constantly defend him. There is an old Facebook group, "I'm happy every day that I wake up and Obama is president." If I was inclined to choose that kind of "activism", I would make a group with the opposite sentiment. In my opinion, Obama is living proof of the need for the 22nd Amendment. I never liked him personally and I am glad that he is no longer in a position of direct authority.

And guess what: if you can say that about Trump, I can say the same about Obama. One rule for everyone. In fact, the only reason I'm comfortable even saying this here is that I have no friends / family to lose reading this (though if they did, so be it) and therefore may pressure me to save be quiet.

Let me be clear: I also have no real love for Trump. There are very few politicians that I care about. And he's done a lot of things that I loathe and hope they continue. But so did his predecessor, who also did very little that I liked. The bottom line is this: despite Quora's growing left-leaning echo chamber, there are a lot of people who feel this way and sadly I think the only thing that will clear up this point is losing to the toupee for the second time in 2020 .

(And before you tell me that will never happen, let me ask you: did you predict Trump would win in the first place? Because I did.)

Donald Trump is, in fact, a problem that must be solved. In the meantime, as far as I'm concerned, the first problem is starting to be taken care of. I don't miss Barack Obama one bit. I'm glad he's no longer in elective office, and as far as I'm concerned, the less influence he has in the world, the better. And on behalf of all the people who I think feel the same way, I'm tired of being afraid to say it.

I am (more or less) a conservative, and have voted Republican most of my life (though never again, or at least not anytime soon). I did not vote for Obama or Trump in their respective elections, for various reasons. Now, there weren't many areas that President Obama and I could agree on BUT, having said that, I would take Obama over Trump any day. Although I was against Obamacare, especially the way it was implemented, I know that it has helped many people to have access to health insurance that they otherwise would not have and it would be a mistake to remove it without something comparable to take your p.

Keep reading

I am (more or less) a conservative, and have voted Republican most of my life (though never again, or at least not anytime soon). I did not vote for Obama or Trump in their respective elections, for various reasons. Now, there weren't many areas that President Obama and I could agree on BUT, having said that, I would take Obama over Trump any day. Although I was against Obamacare, especially the way it was implemented, I know that it has helped many people to have access to health insurance that they would not otherwise have and it would be wrong to eliminate it without something comparable to take its place. The economy improved, although it is debatable (at least for me) if it was because of his administration or because of a natural return to normalcy; however, he did.

Trump treats the presidency as if it were his latest business acquisition. His cabinet is the Alt-Right All-Star team, packed to the brim with fanatics and religious fundamentalists. With only eight months into his tenure, he has trampled on the rights of many (yes, I am talking about LGBT, especially transgender people), has pissed off many of our allies, and has the potential to create a diplomatic fire. in the Pacific Rim, "forcing the hand" of North Korea's "Dear Leader" Kim Jong Un (stable) to start a nuclear war (not entirely Trump's fault; North Korea is the little thug of the schoolyard, who likes to push people until someone finally gets tired of him and slams him to the ground (which sadly hasn't happened yet),

Obama may have been a "rookie" coming in; His background in civics and national politics was a bit meager (which is understandable for someone who spent his formative years in Hawaii, Kenya, and Indonesia, and who was a U.S. Senator for about 4 to 6 years), but he was able to get your sea legs after a while (you must have finally seen "I'm Only a Bill" from ABC's "Schoolhouse Rock" series :-P). It's fair to say that Obama on his worst day was better than Trump on any given day (unless you're a Klan, neo-Nazi, or Southern Baptist).

Ultimately, Barack Obama and his family were a class act, a fact that no one can deny. There were no scandals, no rude, chauvinistic behavior, no "Billy" or "Roger" Obama, and on that front, they were a breath of fresh air. I would be proud if they would move in next to me and be my neighbor (although I'm pretty sure they won't move into my apartment complex - I certainly hope they can do better than that hahaha). That in itself, after four years (or less; hey girl can wait) of Trump (can't call him Trumpy McTrumpface here, right? Oh well, so much for this post seeing the light of day) it will be a great lesson from the Obama administration, regardless of how you feel about its politics.

Obama is a wonderful man and he was a very effective president. He inherited a country in economic free fall, mired in 2 lost wars, facing conditions close to the Depression with a declining healthcare system.

It circled the country in its first 6 months and made tremendous progress in areas such as health care, gay rights, and delivered 7 1/2 years of continued economic growth and decreasing deficits. More Americans had health insurance than at any other time in American history.

He failed to enact a policy to save us from global warming, which I consider his biggest flaw.

Trump is a vile human being who abuses

Keep reading

Obama is a wonderful man and he was a very effective president. He inherited a country in economic free fall, mired in 2 lost wars, facing conditions close to the Depression with a declining healthcare system.

It circled the country in its first 6 months and made tremendous progress in areas such as health care, gay rights, and delivered 7 1/2 years of continued economic growth and decreasing deficits. More Americans had health insurance than at any other time in American history.

He failed to enact a policy to save us from global warming, which I consider his biggest flaw.

Trump is a vile human being who abuses women, steals from his clients, constantly lies, and hates anything that makes him think. He was born a silver spoon and has no respect for meritocracy. His narcissistic personality disorder needs constant praise. He sees relationships as transactional and has no friends other than his children. It goes through wives and lovers as if they were old suits that need to be replaced.

His campaign was based on dividing Americans, vilifying Muslims, Hispanics, homosexuals, feminists, and anyone who did not fit into the lily-white world of Faux News. He made promises he had no intention of keeping, like replacing the ACA with a better system and delivering a tax cut that would benefit the middle class. The one who signed will hurt housing markets, charities and decimate private health insurance in America, all to fatten the rich. Most middle-class families get a pittance, if not a tax increase, and eventually everyone except the rich gets tax increases. He lied that he would not benefit; his share of the tax cut is so large that it is a bribe.

Obviously, he colluded with Russia to steal the elections. On the day he accepted the RNC nomination, he announced that he would not defend NATO allies in Eastern Europe. He publicly asked Russia to spy on Hillary Clinton. His son and son-in-law met with Russian officials during the campaign and transition. He hired Mike Flynn and Paul Manafort, who had serious conflicts of interest abroad. He fired the FBI director for investigating him and now threatens to fire the special counsel. He acts like a man in fear of justice, not someone eager to be exonerated.

I would be surprised if he got out of office without going to jail. Given that Mike Pence led the transition team that means with the Russians, it is unlikely that he will come out unscathed either.

President Obama and President Trump failed to create a comprehensive immigration policy.

The question got me thinking a lot. In my opinion, President Trump, despite being a highly criticized leader in the global and national media, remains a more transparent and less damaging leader than President Obama. There are many reasons on which I base this opinion and I think they should be closely examined. There is a reason President Trump was elected, and it has little to do with the traditional stance of the Republican Party of which he is a part. His schedule seemed s

Keep reading

President Obama and President Trump failed to create a comprehensive immigration policy.

The question got me thinking a lot. In my opinion, President Trump, despite being a highly criticized leader in the global and national media, remains a more transparent and less damaging leader than President Obama. There are many reasons on which I base this opinion and I think they should be closely examined. There is a reason President Trump was elected, and it has little to do with the traditional stance of the Republican Party of which he is a part. His schedule seemed so far-fetched in 2016 that hardly anyone believed he would be elected president. In fact, his ideas, which were considered politically and globally unacceptable, are the components that led to the election. President Obama, on the other hand, did not bring any change to the system. In fact, it was a president who, by entering an agenda to end the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, it ended up simply putting the United States in a weak position in both places and then did not withdraw. Obama did not solve the problems of mass incarceration in the United States or help minorities in the way they hoped. Obama did not punish Wall Street for its reprehensible sales of toxic assets to the world and for causing the worst economic climate since 1929. Obama simply did almost nothing more than deliver speeches and eventually stopped discussing any real change.

While I disagree with Trump's rhetoric or his seemingly racist leanings, at least I know what to expect from his presidency. I also know that at the end of the day, he will only meet parts of his schedule and that what he is doing will generate further growth when he leaves office and immigration reopens. The restrictions he has imposed on the workforce will actually extend growth patterns that began in March 2009. As illogical as it may seem, what Trump created may not have been intentional. The stock market corrected, in 2018 and with this scare, the Federal Reserve had to reboot and change its perspective. The United States too, with labor restrictions and trade wars, You will get the 2% academic inflation level that the Federal Reserve wanted without having to raise interest rates and alter growth prospects. At the same time, the government need not be the main creator of liquidity in the US stock market. This is also being achieved.

Abroad, reducing brain drain from Asian giants like India and China is actually creating more innovation there. This will allow both nations to have sustained long-term growth. Of course, the US will need to open up immigration again, and it will happen when the Trump administration loses in the election or in 2024 by mandatory term limits. In any case, another cycle of growth will begin, as a suppressed immigration policy will allow skilled workers to return again. Where Trump will fail is to bring manufacturing back, and this is where Obama also failed. But in terms of actually carrying out his Agenda, President Trump followed his campaign promises more closely.

Trump has fractured America along racial and social lines, and this damage cannot simply be overlooked. This is where history can judge your Presidency very harshly. Yet once again Obama did very little to reform the structured institutionalized racism that is present in the US For these reasons, while I agree with very little on the Trump Agenda, I will still assert that he is indeed better. in most respects than President Obama.

I had high hopes that Obama would unite our country. Eight years later, I don't see any evidence in his legacy. I can't rate Trump after 8 months in office. Take a much-needed tough stance on foreign affairs. He's trying to keep the bad guys out of this country. He is working to keep America safe. If war ever comes to America's homeland, all the little squabbles won't matter.

Obama was so eager to get all of our troops out of Iraq as quickly as possible that he ignored the fact that the terrorists would re-establish themselves there. He downplayed the rise of the Islamic State even as the Kurds and t

Keep reading

I had high hopes that Obama would unite our country. Eight years later, I don't see any evidence in his legacy. I can't rate Trump after 8 months in office. Take a much-needed tough stance on foreign affairs. He's trying to keep the bad guys out of this country. He is working to keep America safe. If war ever comes to America's homeland, all the little squabbles won't matter.

Obama was so eager to get all of our troops out of Iraq as quickly as possible that he ignored the fact that the terrorists would re-establish themselves there. He downplayed the rise of the Islamic State even as the Kurds and the Iraqi government issued increasingly terrifying warnings.

When a series of uprisings toppled dictators across the Middle East, Obama did not adopt any meaningful policies or take advantage of the situation. The two places where we could have used the Arab Spring to get rid of dictators were Libya and Syria. In Libya, the assassination of our ambassador in Benghazi was just the beginning of a slow collapse into chaos and civil war. In Syria, three years of vacillation in the administration allowed the rise of ISIS, which then spread to Iraq.

He campaigned on the promise that America would be more respected in the world after the Bush years. He did not campaign to apologize for the actions of the United States. He showed the world that we would be a useless ally and an ineffective opponent.

On September 11, 2011, an event coordinated by the Islamic terrorist Al-quada killed nearly 3,000 people due to the Clinton administration's weak foreign affairs position. Eight months after his election, there was an attack on American soil. Do you blame Bush?

We now have a similar situation where, due to the weak position on foreign affairs of the Obama administration, North Korea has become a nuclear threat. If they attack us or one of our allies, will you blame Trump? This threat has been ignored for the last 8 years.

Obama did not close Guantanamo. President Obama took office after strongly condemning many of the Bush administration's counter-terrorism measures. Then he continued with them. He has achieved a unique combination of succeeding in morally discrediting America's counterterrorism policies without actually ending them.

He brought us ObamaCare, a reminder of all that is wrong with big government. It was not difficult to understand, the health insurance administered by the government would fail. When ObamaCare was passed, we were told that it would provide insurance to 32 million people who had no coverage. Eight years later, ObamaCare has covered between 10% and 20% of what was promised. Then there was the broken promise: If we liked our health insurance, we could keep it. What it delivered was less coverage at a higher cost for most Americans.

President Obama was elected in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, and his first big act in office was signing a "stimulus" spending, financed entirely with debt, that was supposed to jumpstart the economy. Congress voted hundreds of billions of dollars for "ready-to-use projects" that Obama later discovered did not exist. Did the money disappear without a trace?

Obama wanted to make sure that we never repeated the problems that led to the financial crisis. The Dodd-Frank financial reforms didn't really reform anything. They created a couple thousand pages of new legislation and many more new regulations that have not fixed anything.

Any Republican elected to office would have been under the same scrutiny from the left. It is time for the Washington bureaucrats to start working together for the good of this country.

Every president was better than Trump, and this is the main reason.

Well, you can do an intense campaign. But once you become president, you are supposed to put aside the animosities and STAND UP and say, "I will be a president to every American, whether they support me or not."

ALL past presidents have said this at one time or another. Obama said he embraced all Americans. George W. Bush said it was a unifier, not a divider. Bill Clinton wanted to help all Americans. So did George HW Bush, even Reagan.

Trump became president and continued to campaign. He does not meet with the American people

Keep reading

Every president was better than Trump, and this is the main reason.

Well, you can do an intense campaign. But once you become president, you are supposed to put aside the animosities and STAND UP and say, "I will be a president to every American, whether they support me or not."

ALL past presidents have said this at one time or another. Obama said he embraced all Americans. George W. Bush said it was a unifier, not a divider. Bill Clinton wanted to help all Americans. So did George HW Bush, even Reagan.

Trump became president and continued to campaign. He does not meet with the American people, he organizes rallies of supporters who sing of his greatness. And he clearly says that he will ONLY preside over those who support him, and any American who doesn't like him is a traitor.

These are the words of a dictator, not a president. For this reason alone, by not reaching all Americans, Trump has made himself unsuitable for the job.

Personally, I consider Obama not only a better president, but a decent and humble man who, despite all the difficulties that the Republican Party put in his way during his first term, was able to be re-elected for a second term! As human beings, none of us are perfect or infallible. Obama was a man destined to appear in the annals of history as the first black president of the largest country in the world. By the way, the year he was elected was the year my family and I immigrated to this wonderful country from Nigeria. For me, as an African, I considered it a good omen. H

Keep reading

Personally, I consider Obama not only a better president, but a decent and humble man who, despite all the difficulties that the Republican Party put in his way during his first term, was able to be re-elected for a second term! As human beings, none of us are perfect or infallible. Obama was a man destined to appear in the annals of history as the first black president of the largest country in the world. By the way, the year he was elected was the year my family and I immigrated to this wonderful country from Nigeria. For me, as an African, I considered it a good omen. His election and inauguration brought the best of our humanity and our nation. People of all ages, races, The creed and the antecedents expressed emotions that were so contagious that one felt that there was hope for the nation to correct the evils of the past regarding the oppression to which minorities were subjected from the nascent period of the founding of this nation. His election also had very positive effects globally. The whole world was paralyzed on the day of its inauguration and America was the envy of the whole world!

To give some answers to the question of who was a better president between him and Trump, I would say unequivocally that Obama was without a doubt a better president. First of all, a man's statements reveal a lot about his character, background, and upbringing. In this sense, Trump is failing! It is incredible that a grown man, much less a grandfather, is as frivolous as the current occupant of the White House in the person of Mr. Donald Trump! His reckless statements reveal a rude and stubborn individual with a poor upbringing despite his family's wealth! He is nothing but a misogynist, vulgar, rude and a very superficial person. With his actions and statements, he has done nothing but discredit the lofty office of the presidency. He brags, he blatantly tells lies, he is wrong on very serious national issues without giving a damn about the consequences of his actions. His presidency has been plagued by the largest number of scandals the White House has ever experienced. All the so-called best brains and minds that he promised to hire to work in his cabinet, the majority, turned out to be unscrupulous and selfish men, who were willing to betray the national interest and compromise for profit. I am of the opinion that his father, who was said to be a mean man, must have treated his mother badly. Trump's older brother was said to be an alcoholic who died young. Trump's irrational behavior makes people doubt his state of mind! Some in the medical field believe that you might be suffering from cerebral syphilis. I understand you admitted that you were very promiscuous in the 80s. How the hell can a man with his wealth be willing to sleep with prostitutes and porn stars with sexually transmitted diseases like HIV and AIDS that exist in this age? A grown man in his 70s and a grandfather who enjoys making disparaging comments about people based on their race, appearance, physique, etc., has a character flaw. A man who revels in the way he treats women who to him are nothing more than objects of sexual amusement. His recent comments and defense of Crown Prince Salman, who was implicated by the CIA in the brutal murder and dismemberment of Khashoggi, the Saudi journalist who was a legal resident of the United States, speaks volumes about Donald Trump's character. Donald Trump is not a man of integrity. France's young President Macron was man enough to reprimand this psychopathic prince during the recent G20 summit in Argentina. Trump's constant denial that there was no Russian meddling in the 2016 election raises questions about his loyalty and ability to handle his post as commander-in-chief. General Mattis revealed yesterday that the Russians tried to meddle in the midterm elections held recently! This man is a disaster waiting to happen. If the Republican Party does not stop or stop it, the polarization it has fostered in the body politic and in society could take decades to repair or correct. Empty barrels as the saying goes, make the loudest noise.

Despite the circumstances of Obama's birth, his maternal grandparents did an excellent job of raising a well-founded young man who managed to fulfill his divinely ordained purpose as the first black president, thus changing the course of our great nation's history. The Obama presidency did not experience any scandals of any kind. He brought to WhiteHouse, a crop of well-educated young men and women of various backgrounds and races, as well as mature brilliant minds who gave their best to serve our beloved country. Osi Okhipo

Other Guides:


GET SPECIAL OFFER FROM OUR PARTNER.