What do you think will happen once technology takes over jobs and we can no longer afford to work?

Updated on : December 6, 2021 by Joel Jordan



What do you think will happen once technology takes over jobs and we can no longer afford to work?

One possibility is that the population decreases.

Instead of the rich gaining wealth by selling more things, as their customers go bankrupt, the rich turn wealth into power. A wealthy minority have armies of robots that go into farming and whatever else is needed (as they can enforce ownership of their robots, probably by biometrics and encrypted user IDs), and can similarly enforce ownership of whatever resource is needed. world has (probably by using military robots). Because robots can be armed, the wealthy are deeply incentivized to limit their wide use, especially

Keep reading

One possibility is that the population decreases.

Instead of the rich gaining wealth by selling more things, as their customers go bankrupt, the rich turn wealth into power. A wealthy minority have armies of robots that go into farming and whatever else is needed (as they can enforce ownership of their robots, probably by biometrics and encrypted user IDs), and can similarly enforce ownership of whatever resource is needed. world has (probably by using military robots). Because robots can be weapons, the rich are deeply incentivized to limit their widespread use, especially to poor people who don't exactly love them.

So the poor die, go back to living in the desert, or become toys / pets of the rich. The money would still exist, but it would only be used for transactions between the rich.

Robot owners can be generous and let everyone have robots, but if they don't have to, I guess they won't. The rich could forge great countries only for the poor to live, and in those countries there would be work and normal money as they do now, but the rich would not care about the fruits of that work, as it would not make sense to them. . At that time, humanity is essentially divided into two species.

The rich would eventually colonize space, and might even leave the planet altogether, in which case the poor would eventually make enough progress to create their own robots, but this just repeats the cycle. So we could have a world in which every century or so a generation of rich people leaves Earth.

I am 83 years old and I am thinking about it a lot right now. I think we will start with a guaranteed minimum income. With today's money, we say that a family of four can buy by buying a really modest home and car for $ 30,000. So maybe I'm saying a little $ 7500 person, including each child. Total healthcare costs nothing for everyone. College and all good free training like high school now.

You start life with a negligible income. You can educate / train yourself all you want and can learn and benefit. Over time, we will include a ton of access to whatever resources / money you might need for something important you want to develop. Speci

Keep reading

I am 83 years old and I am thinking about it a lot right now. I think we will start with a guaranteed minimum income. With today's money, we say that a family of four can buy by buying a really modest home and car for $ 30,000. So maybe I'm saying a little $ 7500 person, including each child. Total healthcare costs nothing for everyone. College and all good free training like high school now.

You start life with a negligible income. You can educate / train yourself all you want and can learn and benefit. Over time, we will include a ton of access to whatever resources / money you might need for something important you want to develop. Especially if you can't get or want a good job. Salary / pay / commissions are kept in addition to allowance. But maybe taxable.

Sounds like a good world to get into. Massively growing economy, massively growing government benefits services. Whether the economy - corporations and all - provides us with many jobs or not. Or if we think / create jobs and services between us or not. People will buy everything for the population of the United States, now 250 million at a time. :)

Huge increase from 20 hours of surfing. :)

This will be the problem when that time comes, but there are sociologists and economists who have already guessed / devised / developed a plan. It would have to be a so-called “robot tax” tax on companies and / or corporations that use robotics to eliminate the majority of job positions for workers with repetitive movements. It can be called the Universal Basic Income, and it will knowingly have to be enacted by our government, which is actually in league with the one percent. But to succeed in this proposal, politicians would have to show that they are FOR the voters and not for the billionaires. There would be

Keep reading

This will be the problem when that time comes, but there are sociologists and economists who have already guessed / devised / developed a plan. It would have to be a so-called “robot tax” tax on companies and / or corporations that use robotics to eliminate the majority of job positions for workers with repetitive movements. It can be called the Universal Basic Income, and it will knowingly have to be enacted by our government, which is actually in league with the one percent. But to succeed in this proposal, politicians would have to show that they are FOR the voters and not for the billionaires. There would be other jobs that CANNOT be done by automation and / or robotics. If you want a more objective answer from an intellectual point of view, go online and carefully read the information from the WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM on the FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION. GOOD LUCK !!

It depends on where you live.

Many countries tax businesses and pay everyone a minimal amount. As people work less, their costs drop dramatically. There are no costs to travel. No babysitting. Much less home services like yard work and handyman work at least for financial returns. Property values ​​will be affected.

The tax system will change to make multinationals liable for taxes in the country of sale pro rata of global profits. So Apple sells $ 5 billion in Australia as 5% of global sales and they pay Australian tax on 5% of global profits.

I would hate to be rich in America. Guns can be a huge influence

Keep reading

It depends on where you live.

Many countries tax businesses and pay everyone a minimal amount. As people work less, their costs drop dramatically. There are no costs to travel. No babysitting. Much less home services like yard work and handyman work at least for financial returns. Property values ​​will be affected.

The tax system will change to make multinationals liable for taxes in the country of sale pro rata of global profits. So Apple sells $ 5 billion in Australia as 5% of global sales and they pay Australian tax on 5% of global profits.

I would hate to be rich in America. Weapons can have a great influence on conspicuous consumption.

  • we will be "saved by the bell", an "infinite economy" will be invented and people will be saved!
  • What we should really fear is that when the government does not need humans to generate tax revenue, inventions, clean the street and do worldly things, then we will no longer be pampered and receive lenient sentences from the judges, but severe punishments, deportation and be killed.
  • but we will be forced to be smarter, wiser and more knowledgeable.

Only the labor market will happen in the whole world. We need the leader of our country to start investing in the educational infrastructure for the poor population. We can plan for the future, we eliminate the entire workforce and the human beings are middle-class Americans who graduate from college and work in a professional job with income for a family of 200 thousand per year.

We will adopt a UBI that allows us to get through that period with a bit of fidgeting or we will face truly epic years of depression, homelessness and famine that make the Great Depression look like a minor recession. Right now we are on the firm path to the future, which will lead to a violent revolution.

Catherine, I don't agree with your premise. Technology, particularly AI, will only create more different jobs. Meanwhile, every day is a school day to prepare for the future.

Carver wrightman

aka Cecil R. Williams

Everything will be available at no cost and no one will have to struggle to survive. Like plants, we will simply absorb nutrients and sunlight.

The only logical consequence would be the end of the monetary system if we can safely assume that basic human rights must be protected, no matter what kind of socio-economic system exists.

If 99% of full automation can ever be achieved within a transition phase that can still ensure the protection of human rights (and can do so according to calculations), the monetary purchasing power of 99% of the population would be reduced to zero. The demand for human needs will not disappear, but if the supply depends on money for labor, as in the current market system, you are in a paradoxical situation.

Keep reading

The only logical consequence would be the end of the monetary system if we can safely assume that basic human rights must be protected, no matter what kind of socio-economic system exists.

If 99% of full automation can ever be achieved within a transition phase that can still ensure the protection of human rights (and can do so according to calculations), the monetary purchasing power of 99% of the population would be reduced to zero. The demand for human needs will not disappear, but if the supply depends on money for labor, as in the current market system, you are in a paradoxical situation. You cannot even speak of "choice", since the choice will be made automatically, a play on words.

However, the choice of all humanity must reside on the premise that AI robots should never be designed in such a way that they can pose a threat to fauna and flora in the only habitat we have, planet Earth. They must be designed in a way that is beneficial to all human beings and all living things in our pale blue point.

The other alternative, assuming this outdated market system is still in place, is for all of us to become engineers, AI developers, technicians, quality controllers, etc. The control and maintenance of the machines would have to remain in human hands. Surgical robots must be programmed and supervised by people with medical experience, food production facilities such as fully automated aquaponics stations are programmed by experts in agriculture, botany, chemistry, etc. logistics experts. The possibilities are endless. Speaking for myself, I'd be on that system every day just to check the robots are working properly. It is in our best interest, including mine.

Buckminster Fuller quote:

“We should do away with the absolutely misleading notion that everyone has to earn a living. It is a fact today that one in ten thousand of us can achieve a technological breakthrough capable of supporting everyone else. Young people today are absolutely right to acknowledge this nonsense of making a living. We keep inventing jobs because of this false idea that everyone has to be employed in some kind of heavy work because, according to Malthusian Darwinian theory, they must justify their right to exist. So we have inspectors of inspectors and people who make instruments for inspectors to inspect inspectors.

It is a question of economics. As the minimum wage continues to rise, more and more jobs will be automated.

  • Today, most grocery stores in the US already have banks of "self checkout" kiosks. In a decade, they will have almost completely replaced people-run checkout counters.
  • Today, a growing number of spectators may choose to buy their tickets at an automated kiosk. In the future, that choice will disappear.
  • Department stores already have almost no help on the floor. A ten percent increase in the minimum wage will complete the process.
  • Fast food restaurants are on their way to full automation. Full-se
Keep reading

It is a question of economics. As the minimum wage continues to rise, more and more jobs will be automated.

  • Today, most grocery stores in the US already have banks of "self checkout" kiosks. In a decade, they will have almost completely replaced people-run checkout counters.
  • Today, a growing number of spectators may choose to buy their tickets at an automated kiosk. In the future, that choice will disappear.
  • Department stores already have almost no help on the floor. A ten percent increase in the minimum wage will complete the process.
  • Fast food restaurants are on their way to full automation. Full-service food and beverage establishments will follow quickly.
  • Even warfare will become more automated, as autonomous drones replace humans on land, sea, and in the air. This conversion has already started.

The list goes on. Certainly almost all repetitive clerical jobs, most manufacturing, transportation and warehousing jobs will be lost due to automation in the near future, at the same rate as the demand for higher wages. Personal human service will become a luxury, reserved only for the wealthy.

The union movement will resist the growth of automation. Luddite groups will commit acts of civil disobedience and even violence. In the end, your protests will be useless. Anyway, people didn't like those jobs.

In the next fifty years, people without exceptional skills, great creativity, and remarkable flexibility will find themselves with very little to do. This could usher in a better world or a dystopian hell.

Other Guides:


GET SPECIAL OFFER FROM OUR PARTNER.