If all jobs paid the same salary, what would you be doing?

Updated on : December 6, 2021 by Dustin Duffy



If all jobs paid the same salary, what would you be doing?

Then I would do business. What a communist question!
How can we expect equality everywhere?
Read the conclusion first.


After having seen them, feminists, humanists, secularists, altruists, now we are seeing egalists or communists.
This question totally changes the parameters of success and the conditions that will follow are the following:

1) Since all people earn the same and all jobs pay the same, you will end up having the same property when you retire. Now the parameter of success will be inherited money and property from the patriarchal system.

2) You will be judged not by what you earn, but by what you save each hour, day, month, year.

Keep reading

Then I would do business. What a communist question!
How can we expect equality everywhere?
Read the conclusion first.


After having seen them, feminists, humanists, secularists, altruists, now we are seeing egalists or communists.
This question totally changes the parameters of success and the conditions that will follow are the following:

1) Since all people earn the same and all jobs pay the same, you will end up having the same property when you retire. Now the parameter of success will be inherited money and property from the patriarchal system.

2) You will not be judged by what you earn, but by what you save each hour, day, month, year, and when you turn 60.

3) Now that earning foreign exchange has not remained a parameter of success, it has shifted to real estate. The more land he owes, the richer he will be called. Also the big house will be a measure of success.

4) Now the purchasing power of all the people in the world is the same. Therefore, all consumer products will sell for almost the same price. Therefore, the luxury products you owe will also not be the yardstick to judge your success. Instead, it will be measured based on your level of multitasking. Simply the number of jobs you can do in a 24-hour period.

5) Now success will be judged by the woman you marry or the man you marry.
Because salary is not that important. It will also be judged by the children you have. I mean, the more talented they are, the more successful you will be. They will be the real assets.

6) Now the success will also be measured by the precious stone and the metals that you have.

Conclusion:
Everyone will start trading because they want to earn more. Therefore, after a particular period at work, they will leave work. And start trading. There will be a massive abandonment. Therefore, companies lose enormous human resources. Companies will have two options: increase wages for work or automate everything. The second option is not as viable at this time. So the first option is unanimous.
Therefore, such a situation is hypothetical. Equality is hypothetical. The inequality is real.

agriculture because in the end that is where we are heading since in a few years innovation would cease, economies would collapse. My observation is that the world relies on the "average" to execute the vision and directives of the "smartest", so when everyone is paid the same for all jobs, I would say there won't be much of a difference between the smart ones. and average in terms of how the world / society perceives them, because generally smart people are successful and we measure success primarily in terms of wealth and monetary compensation.

In most companies, employee performance is

Keep reading

agriculture because in the end that is where we are heading since in a few years innovation would cease, economies would collapse. My observation is that the world relies on the "average" to execute the vision and directives of the "smartest", so when everyone is paid the same for all jobs, I would say there won't be much of a difference between the smart ones. and average in terms of how the world / society perceives them, because generally smart people are successful and we measure success primarily in terms of wealth and monetary compensation.

In most companies, employee performance is rewarded with an increase in monetary benefits, and since there would be no incentive to take risks, since all rewards would be equal, there would be no incentive for employees within a company (assuming everyone in the company receives a payment). the same) work hard and progress professionally. Then innovation, creativity and competitiveness would be reduced.

On a professional level, words like "desire" and "aspiration" would be foreign to people after a few years, and that is a very dangerous place for any society.


Economically and from a business point of view it would be disastrous but the liberal arts would definitely benefit the most, I would say there would be an influx of artistic creativity. But art cannot survive without an economy that produces goods and services, the most important of which is agriculture / livestock.

If all jobs pay the same, then it is equivalent to abolishing the concept of money.

Most of humanity needs to be ruled directly or indirectly and there must be a chain of command and in my opinion "power" is just another manifestation of "money / wealth".

The reason I place such an emphasis on money is because over time, when all jobs pay the same, the economic disparity between the majority of the working class would dissolve and when their purchasing power became comparable / similar, the value of goods and services would collapse, the bargaining power between the trading parties will cease to exist. And as we all know, everything revolves around money.

The world wouldn't change instantly, but as our psyche evolves to adapt to this situation, what I wrote above could be one of the possible outcomes, but I think there is a chance that the exact opposite will happen, but my bet is on it. first. scenario I described.

Other Guides:


GET SPECIAL OFFER FROM OUR PARTNER.