How can the universe expand into nothing without turning it into something?

Updated on : December 7, 2021 by Riley Fletcher



How can the universe expand into nothing without turning it into something?

It cannot, wherever it goes, it becomes the universe. That is why you can never go beyond the limit, you just bring the universe with you.

Can't Nick. It's all a bunch of nonsense. These so-called experts are trying to explain something they have no idea about.

Q: Is the mathematical possibility of humans coming from the Big Bang too low for humans to exist without some kind of creator, or is it something theists just say?

It's something theists simply say to try to rationalize why the particular deity they believe in (and not any of the other deities worshiped throughout human history, of course) must exist. But you will always run into incredibly high probabilities when you try to calculate the probability that something happened based on all the variables that led to it happening, and that's because those probabilities only apply to

Keep reading

Q: Is the mathematical possibility of humans coming from the Big Bang too low for humans to exist without some kind of creator, or is it something theists just say?

It's something theists simply say to try to rationalize why the particular deity they believe in (and not any of the other deities worshiped throughout human history, of course) must exist. But you will always run into incredibly high probabilities when you try to calculate the probability that something happened based on all the variables that led to it happening, and that's because those probabilities only apply to predict the outcome in advance.

Consider the improbability of someone dealing a shuffled deck of cards and simply putting in a full suit (eg, all clubs, all hearts, etc.). From a purely mathematical point of view, the odds of doing this from a shuffled deck of cards are 635,013,559,600 to one. Which is, of course, incredibly unlikely and you would be right to suspect that the dealer had somehow manipulated the deck in your favor.

Except ... let's say I deal thirteen cards from a shuffled deck and get a totally random mix of hearts, clubs, diamonds, and spades. What are the odds that I will lay down the exact combination of cards that I made? Still 635,013,559,600 to one. How can this happen? Well, it's all because 635 billion to 1 against was a chance to get it right before the cards were dealt. In fact, now that they have been distributed, the probability is actually 1. Talking about the improbability of something that has actually already happened is not helpful.

Similarly, I was once able to consider the probabilities of my own existence given the vagaries of my ancestry. In order to be here exactly as I am, each and every one of my ancestors throughout the entire course of human history must have met and mated with the right person at the exact moment. If my great-great-grandmother on my father's side had married the boy her parents had forbidden her to marry instead of the man they approved of, I could have a differently shaped nose, no genetic predisposition to diabetes, bigger feet, etc. . Or He may not have been born at all. In fact, given the size of the human population over time and the size of the mating group,

No, it is very clear that some external force must have been guiding each and every ancestor from the dawn of time until my mother met my father, making sure they met and mated exactly on time ( Did I mention the two miscarriages my mother had before having children? Me?) In fact, given the fact that many of my ancestors traveled the world before meeting due to various political upheavals, I think it's It's fair to say that most of human history was manipulated by this external force to ensure that it would be born exactly the way it was, little feet, diabetes and all, right?

Well, no. Actually, if something had been different in the past, the result would simply have been different and I wouldn't be here arguing about it. If you tried to estimate in advance (say, 10,000 years ago) the odds that it would come out exactly as I did, the odds would be ridiculously, incredibly small. But if you now try to estimate the odds that it will turn out the way I did based on my past ancestry, the odds are exactly 1: 1.

When it comes to the elements of the periodic table found throughout the Universe, only the first two originated in the Big Bang: hydrogen and helium. Everything else was formed from stars, either:

  • fused in their cores, from lighter elements to heavier ones,
  • built in supernovae, where the tremendous release of energy and particles created elements as high up on the periodic table as we know how to go,
  • created from mergers of collapsed objects, such as two neutron stars, resulting in the heavier elements,
  • or created later from the nebulous remains of stars, either by radioacti
Keep reading

When it comes to the elements of the periodic table found throughout the Universe, only the first two originated in the Big Bang: hydrogen and helium. Everything else was formed from stars, either:

  • fused in their cores, from lighter elements to heavier ones,
  • built in supernovae, where the tremendous release of energy and particles created elements as high up on the periodic table as we know how to go,
  • created from mergers of collapsed objects, such as two neutron stars, resulting in the heavier elements,
  • or created later from the nebulous remains of stars, either by radioactive decay or by the explosion of those atoms by high-energy cosmic radiation.

In all cases, this enriched matter is incorporated (along with the leftover hydrogen and helium) into future generations of everything that follows, including nebulae, stars, and planets. This includes our own Solar System and everything in it, including the Sun and planet Earth. It is literally a fact that over 90% (by mass) of everything in our world was at one point part of a star, ejected back into interstellar space, often multiple times, before ending up as part of our thriving biologically active world. . .

But when we look at the full range of elements on the periodic table, one is missing that you might have expected to be there: 43, technetium, a shiny gray metal as dense as lead with a melting point of more than 3000 °. F, that just doesn't happen naturally in our world.

Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons user 28bytes, +

The reason it does not occur is because all of its isotopes are radioactive, and the longest-lived ones have a half-life of a few million years. Even if the Earth was created with significant amounts of it, the chances are tiny that there will be even an atom of it left now, after more than four billion years have passed. In fact, it is only from the decomposition of materials like uranium ore (bottom) that technetium occurs naturally, and each gram of uranium gives rise to roughly one picogram (10 ^ -12 g) of technetium.

Image Credit: Andrew Silver, USGS, via Wikimedia +

Sure, we can produce it from nuclear fission, where we've made tons, or from particle accelerators. We can even make good use of one of its isotopes for medicinal purposes, which we continue to do today. But even though this element does not occur naturally on Earth, it does occur in stars and not through any of the processes we listed above. When stars produce technetium, they do so through a process that is much more subtle than simply fusing elements or creating them in the catastrophic environments of a supernova or neutron star merger.

Instead, there is a very constant process that takes place in certain classes of stars, the s process, where slow neutrons are captured.

Image credit: European Southern Observatory +

It is the giant stars that produce free neutrons while burning helium, from the fusion of carbon-13 or neon-22. Our Sun will one day become one, swelling to more than 100 times its current size. When this occurs, and free neutrons are copiously produced, they add to the heavy elements within the star, one at a time, allowing the elements to move slowly up the periodic table. You may think it's a long way to get to technetium, but stars live for hundreds of millions of years in this giant phase. There is a whole class of stars known as technetium stars that display this element as part of their spectrum, with one of the brightest almost visible to the naked eye.

Image credit: European Southern Observatory (ESO), +

Actually, this slow neutron capture allows us to build all the elements heavier than iron down to lead and bismuth, but technetium is special because it is only found naturally in these giant stars. In fact, it is only visible after a specific stage in the life cycle of these stars: after the elements of the process produced in the core are extracted and carried to the outer layers of the star. Technetium was made in the laboratory in the 1930s, but it was first discovered in these giant stars in 1952, the only natural place in the Universe where it has been discovered in great abundance.

This is incredibly interesting, because it means that technetium must have formed incredibly recently, because everything would disappear after a few million years. As these giant stars reach the end of their lives, they will eventually fly their outer layers into planetary nebulae, further enriching the interstellar medium with mature material to form the next generation of stars and planets.

Image credit: NASA / ESA and the Hubble Space +

But when this happens, there is no more technetium; it is a signature that we have never found in a single planetary nebula. The short time span between the moment this short-lived element rises to the surface and the lift-off of the outer layers is long enough, even in a few million years, that by the time the material for the next generation of stars is available, there are no traces of this item left.

If you have enough energy, resources, and time, you can build technetium artificially. But if you want to find it in nature? You have only two options: wait billions of years for the correct radioactive decay to occur, or head into the later stages of the life of a red giant star and bask in the presence of this short-lived metallic marvel.

The observable universe is 13.6 billion light years in size. This is only the section that we can see outward from Earth (the universe probably exists beyond this point), but the light will NEVER reach us. My answer below will be based on both the observable universe and the multiverse / infinite universe theories. There are popular theories that postulate that other planets and races "are like us"

First of all, there is something called the Drake equation that measures the probability of intelligent life within our known local galaxy / cluster / universe. There should be 10,000 planets with intelli

Keep reading

The observable universe is 13.6 billion light years in size. This is only the section that we can see outward from Earth (the universe probably exists beyond this point), but the light will NEVER reach us. My answer below will be based on both the observable universe and the multiverse / infinite universe theories. There are popular theories that postulate that other planets and races "are like us"

First of all, there is something called the Drake equation that measures the probability of intelligent life within our known local galaxy / cluster / universe. There should be 10,000 planets with intelligent life to communicate outward in our galaxy alone! Multiply this by then 100 billion - 2 trillion galaxies in our known universe, the odds that another planet "is like us" is very likely.

on the other hand, if the universe is truly Infinite, as some people suggest, then there is another version of you and everyone you meet. In fact, there are an infinite number of you, me, your friends, Hitler, Chaplain Charlie, Mother Teresa. All you can think of.

If you work on any of the bases that I have presented, then the answer would be a profound YES!

We are not alone, that is mathematically true. But will we ever communicate with them? Unlikely.

By definition, nothing can come out of nowhere.

This is what we know and a logical conclusion.

Scientists cannot tell us how or why the Universe came into being, since the required and unleashed pure power is so far from Planck's density that they cannot even theorize it.

However, what do we know? That it was not an uncontrolled random explosion, nor a "Big Bang". How do we know?

The Big Bang was not the beginning, after all

, what else do we know? The Universe is strictly controlled by laws that we can measure, understand, and work with. The laws of mathematics and physics control everything. We know about t

Keep reading

By definition, nothing can come out of nowhere.

This is what we know and a logical conclusion.

Scientists cannot tell us how or why the Universe came into being, since the required and unleashed pure power is so far from Planck's density that they cannot even theorize it.

However, what do we know? That it was not an uncontrolled random explosion, nor a "Big Bang". How do we know?

The Big Bang was not the beginning, after all

, what else do we know? The Universe is strictly controlled by laws that we can measure, understand, and work with. The laws of mathematics and physics control everything. We know the four primary forces and the delicate balance between them and that if any law is unbalanced, the Universe will collapse.

Given the technology, we can send a ship anywhere in the Universe, regardless of how long it takes, knowing that it will arrive in time to the place where it is sent. This despite the constant movement and rotation of galaxies and solar systems.

So we have a Universe of organized energy, of matter, governed by strict laws that we can measure and understand.

We live on a unique planet in a galaxy perfectly prepared for life. A literal gem in space. (See the movie, "The Privileged Planet").

Evolutionists criticize the word "design", but literally, the Universe and everything in it accurately meets the definition. Nothing in the Universe could have happened by random, unguided natural processes.

So we have design and law. Strict control that prevents the entire shed from collapsing. Nothing at random.

Here again is the implication that is anathema to evolutionists: it was created by an intelligence of incredible power.

This is a common question and people want to know the answer.

I'm not a huge Star Trek fan, but you'll relate better to this:

If the Enterprise could do better than warp speed and reach the end of the universe ...

What would they meet (or date) at that time?

The ancient Greeks asked this question (although no starship).

There was no response so far. What is outside the universe does not exist. Not even a vacuum cleaner. That would imply the need for matter or space-time. It is the same at the edge of the universe as it was at the Big Bang when the universe was a fraction of a fraction of its

Keep reading

This is a common question and people want to know the answer.

I'm not a huge Star Trek fan, but you'll relate better to this:

If the Enterprise could do better than warp speed and reach the end of the universe ...

What would they meet (or date) at that time?

The ancient Greeks asked this question (although no starship).

There was no response so far. What is outside the universe does not exist. Not even a vacuum cleaner. That would imply the need for matter or space-time. It is the same at the edge of the universe as it was at the Big Bang, when the universe was a fraction of a fraction of its size.

There is nothing outside of this universe that we can observe that we can talk about because it may just be dark matter or nothing at all. As far as we know, neither space nor time exists outside of the universe.

(The Greeks said what if we shoot an arrow at the edge of space at the end of the heavens ...?)

Good question, but there is no coherent answer anywhere. However, it cannot be a vacuum. Space is a void. So what is outside is inconceivable to you and me.

Good question. The standard answer you will get (it's in all of the scientific literature) is that only space is expanding and matter is transported along with space as space expands. But the honest truth is, if one just bothers to think about this more deeply, and if one puts dogmatic scientific brainwashing aside for a moment, there is no way one can prove this one way or another. All we can do is make assumptions and the standard assumption will be the one indicated. But your question raises an interesting thought experiment. if all matter also expands, including the atom

Keep reading

Good question. The standard answer you will get (it's in all of the scientific literature) is that only space is expanding and matter is transported along with space as space expands. But the honest truth is, if one just bothers to think this more deeply, and if one puts dogmatic scientific brainwashing aside for a moment, there is no way one can prove this one way or another. All we can do is make assumptions and the standard assumption will be the one indicated. But your question raises an interesting thought experiment. if all matter is also expanding, including the atoms of which we are composed, the only possible proof that these atoms are undergoing such expansion can come from an Absolute frame of reference that cannot exist within the finite universe, it can only exist as an Absolute frame of reference that is both inside and outside the universe. That is, from a conceptual frame of reference that fully takes into account the whole of reality as it really exists. If our finite universe can be seen in all its complexity as it actually exists in its Totality, then perhaps God would possess accurate knowledge in this regard, because if God knows all things, then God could see how fast the universe is expanding. and the speed with which all the atoms in the universe expand, all in relation to each other. Our finite human minds, on the other hand, they cannot see the whole of reality as it actually exists, so all we can do is make assumptions, even though some of the assumptions you will get as standard answers are dogmatically stated ... this dogmatism, however, does not it makes the answers you get from the so-called scientific establishment more than just guesses. We are not gods, we are mortals.

I'm by no means an expert, but as far as I know, all the current evidence points to yes. These are the relevant facts that make us think like this:

1. The universe is extraordinarily flat. We can understand what this means in 2D by considering triangles in a sphere, a plane, and a saddle:


Notice that triangles in a plane have angles that add up to 180 degrees, while triangles in a sphere have angles that add up to more than 180 degrees (in the diagram above, they add up to 270 degrees), and triangles in a chair have angles that add up to less than 180 degrees. We say that a sphere has positive curvature, a

Keep reading

I'm by no means an expert, but as far as I know, all the current evidence points to yes. These are the relevant facts that make us think like this:

1. The universe is extraordinarily flat. We can understand what this means in 2D by considering triangles in a sphere, a plane, and a saddle:


Notice that triangles in a plane have angles that add up to 180 degrees, while triangles in a sphere have angles that add up to more than 180 degrees (in the diagram above, they add up to 270 degrees), and triangles in a chair have angles that add up to less than 180 degrees. We say that a sphere has a positive curvature, a saddle has a negative curvature, and a plane is, well, flat.

Current measurements based on observations of type IA supernovae indicate that our universe is extraordinarily flat. General relativity says that a flat universe means that the total energy density of the entire universe is very close to a special value known as the critical density.

2. General relativity states that the expansion rate of the universe is determined by the energy composition of the universe. We now know the energy density of the universe, but determining what exactly constitutes this energy and in what proportion will tell us the ultimate fate of the universe. Initially, cosmologists believed that regular matter made up most of this energy. However, they soon realized that they were wrong for two reasons. First, all known matter and radiation accounted for only 1/6 of all matter in the universe. The remaining 5/6 is a mysterious form of matter that physicists refer to as dark matter. In second place, Precision measurements of cosmic microwave background radiation indicate that even including the combined contribution of regular matter, radiation, and dark matter, the total density only adds up to 30% of the critical density. But if the universe is flat, which implies that the total energy density is actually roughly equal to the critical density, what does the other 70% of the energy represent? Physicists believe that space has an intrinsic energy density known as a cosmological constant. Einstein was the first person to come up with this idea, although he later removed it from General Relativity in an attempt to create a static universe. Today's cosmologists believe that this cosmological constant actually makes up most of the energy in the universe. Einstein was the first person to come up with this idea, although he later removed it from General Relativity in an attempt to create a static universe. Today's cosmologists believe that this cosmological constant actually makes up most of the energy in the universe. Einstein was the first person to come up with this idea, although he later removed it from General Relativity in an attempt to create a static universe. Today's cosmologists believe that this cosmological constant actually makes up most of the energy in the universe. Einstein was the first person to come up with this idea, although he later removed it from General Relativity in an attempt to create a static universe. Today's cosmologists believe that this cosmological constant actually makes up most of the energy in the universe. Einstein was the first person to come up with this idea, although he later removed it from General Relativity in an attempt to create a static universe. Today's cosmologists believe that this cosmological constant actually makes up most of the energy in the universe.

It turns out that a higher value of the cosmological constant leads to a higher rate of expansion. It also leads to an ever-increasing rate of expansion, because the cosmological constant is an intrinsic property of space and does not dilute as the universe expands, unlike the energy density of matter (the same amount of matter has than spread out more space).

In short, cosmologists have determined that the universe is flat, and therefore the energy density of the universe is approximately equal to the critical density. They have also established that the relationship between the energy density of all matter and radiation in the universe and the critical density, math \ Omega_ {m} / math, is 30% or 0.3. The remaining 70% or 0.7 comes from the relationship between the energy density of the cosmological constant and the critical density, math \ Omega_ {v} / math. The equations of general relativity then show that this particular combination leads to an accelerated expansion of the universe, as indicated by the red line.

So in conclusion, yes, we believe that the universe will expand forever, and at an ever-increasing rate!

THE UNIVERSE

There is only "ONE" Universe, and it has always been here, and it is infinite. You cannot expand infinity, change it or reduce it.

OUR TRAINING

"OUR" formation is all the galaxies that surround us, to simplify it. There could be any number of formations like ours, or just one, "OUR", which could be part of another or several other formations like ours. During the expansion of OUR FORMATION - (The electromagnetic spectrum has accelerated to the speed of the sense of light, has developed and continues to the present. Matter has been expanding at a much slower rate.) - The "PUL GRAVITATIONAL

Keep reading

THE UNIVERSE

There is only "ONE" Universe, and it has always been here, and it is infinite. You cannot expand infinity, change it or reduce it.

OUR TRAINING

"OUR" formation is all the galaxies that surround us, to simplify it. There could be any number of formations like ours, or just one, "OUR", which could be part of another or several other formations like ours. During the expansion of OUR FORMATION - (The electromagnetic spectrum has accelerated to the speed of the sense of light, has developed and continues to the present. Matter has been expanding at a much slower rate.) - The "SHOT GRAVITATIONAL "FREE-FORM GRAVITY, ENERGY, and MATTER extending far beyond the current location of our galaxies is pulling galaxies outward, and to be clear, the electromagnetic spectrum and matter are moving in all directions.

EXTERNAL ACCELERATION of the GALAXIES

During the expansion of OUR FORMATION - (The electromagnetic spectrum has accelerated to the speed of the sense of light, has developed and continues to the present. Matter has been expanding at a much slower rate.) - The "SHOT GRAVITATIONAL "FREE-FORM GRAVITY, ENERGY, and MATTER extending far beyond the current location of our galaxies is pulling galaxies outward, and to be clear, the electromagnetic spectrum and matter are moving in all directions.

Our training will reduce its rate of acceleration as the gravity pulling us out becomes thinner and less force. Our formation will continue to move outward even after the gravitational pull becomes negligible due to the momentum achieved. There afterwards the speed would remain constant because there is no resistance, and it will be equal to a very small percentage of the speed of light.

There was never a Big Bang, the beginning of our training started with a little "UMPH".

By Robert Evan Howard / aslodge. com

THE GREAT CRUNCH

The speculations of this theory claim exactly the same thing. The reason our universe is expanding is the outward push of a strange force. Some suggest that it is the remnant of the Big Bang itself. Others have an even more exciting theory: dark energy. The possibility here is probably a "negative" gravitational force. Instead of pulling, push. But the word 'dark' implies that we know next to nothing about it. So it is more of a hypothesis than a theory. But a viable one.

Now, once this 'push' subsides, the universe is likely to collapse under its own gravity. And shrinking

Keep reading

THE GREAT CRUNCH

The speculations of this theory claim exactly the same thing. The reason our universe is expanding is the outward push of a strange force. Some suggest that it is the remnant of the Big Bang itself. Others have an even more exciting theory: dark energy. The possibility here is probably a "negative" gravitational force. Instead of pulling, push. But the word 'dark' implies that we know next to nothing about it. So it is more of a hypothesis than a theory. But a viable one.

Now, once this 'push' subsides, the universe is likely to collapse under its own gravity. And by shrinking in on itself, it can even cease to exist. I guess just invert the following image!

And probably to nothing.

YES, I KNOW. THAT SCARES!

Fortunately for us, I'm pretty sure none of us will be there to witness!

©

Short answer:

According to my theory, Space-Mass-Energy (and expressions of Reality in Our Local Universe) are various Densities of Quantized Infinitesimal Entities called Quantities / Atoms of Reality.

Expansion of space, wave-particle duality, virtual particles moving in and out of existence, gravitation, gravitational lenses, etc. are the result of space-mass-energy interactions / interconversions.

Each infinitesimal entity in our local universe are parallel / alternate existences of primeval atoms, but their individuality is absolute.

Under Entanglement, entities can

Keep reading

©

Short answer:

According to my theory, Space-Mass-Energy (and expressions of Reality in Our Local Universe) are various Densities of Quantized Infinitesimal Entities called Quantities / Atoms of Reality.

Expansion of space, wave-particle duality, virtual particles moving in and out of existence, gravitation, gravitational lenses, etc. are the result of space-mass-energy interactions / interconversions.

Each infinitesimal entity in our local universe are parallel / alternate existences of primeval atoms, but their individuality is absolute.

Under Entanglement, entities can share and communicate their statuses due to the above reasons.

Each individuality of Our Local Universe has an absolute character, but we measure them relatively.

During the Big Bang or similar events, the primeval atoms were transcribed / reincarnated as quantized infinitesimal entities called Quanta / reality atoms.

Quanta / Atoms of Reality represents the time-process value of our local universe.

Each Quanta / Atom of Reality in Our Local Universe are Parallel / Alternative Stocks of Primal Atom (s) that were transcribed in Our Local Universe.

It is a bit strange in the context of our perspective of Reality, but Our Universe is made of Infinite Infinite Multiverse.

Each unit value is an infinite of infinitesimal values, each infinite is a unit value of a higher realm; There are parallel / alternative / skewed value systems in all possible directions and dimensions.

The Absolute Reality is like the Infinitely Infinite Spectrum, we have evolved to feel and understand only a few, with this we paint Our Perspective of Reality.

We are immersed in the Whole Spectrum, Multiverses and Universes surround us, we have to evolve to feel them.

More details:

The Infinity of the Absolute Totality of the Absolute Reality is not an option, it is an Absolute Truth integrated into the Absolute Totality of the Absolute Reality; It is from this that we perceive Our Finitized Perspective of the Absolute Reality.

What we perceive as Universe and Multiverse will depend on Our Perspectives and their definitions.

The Absolute Totality of the Absolute Reality cannot stop at an intermediate point, it should be an infinitely infinite continuum defined for its infinitesimals; otherwise, if there was no resistance, everything would have disintegrated at infinite speeds.

Earth can float in the solar system, the solar system in the galaxy, the galaxy in the super galaxy, the super galaxy in the universe, the universe in the multiverse, etc., etc., but they should all have some limits / contours that define and differentiate them from what they are not.

The Absolute Reality has no logical reason, Physical or Mathematical, to become and remain finite. The Infinity of the Absolute Totality of Reality defines our finitude; It is from this that we perceive our finite perspective of reality.

The Infinities of Our Perception are extrapolations of Our Finite Perspective of the Absolute Reality, but the Absolute Infinity is Part of the Absolute Totality of the Absolute Reality.

Without an Absolute, the Relative does not exist, it is from the Absolutes that we extract the Finite Relative Perspective.

It is like an object and its shadows.

The Absolute Totality can be a superimposed sum of all the options, but it will be a Highly Random State, because each option has no reasons for any interrelation with each other; In order not to randomize, the options must be interrelated.

The structure and order are highly unnatural, and something much larger than magic needs constant efforts to maintain them.

It is like dynamically maintaining a living body, plus a Living and Conscious Effort; because, unlike a non-living object, our local universe appears to be a highly dynamic entity.

Every day we blame thermodynamics.

Or we can think that everything is the result of pure chance (Randomness of Randomness) or accept it as pious interventions or Permutations and Combinations of the previous two.

The third option seems realistic for our local universe, because randomness is an unavoidable fact of reality and the persistent transient efforts of a singular cumulative universal entity can only keep us out of random destiny.

God may or may not have a Physical or Humanized form as religion holds, but still there should be a Universal Cumulative Singular Entity that Governs Our Local Universe, constantly pulling us out of Random destiny.

God could be the result of the randomness of the absolute randomness.

God of our local universe is an entity that controls / regulates the degree of randomness in our local universe.

Бесплатные фото на Pixabay - Сеть, Земля, Блок-Цепь, Глобус

Further Details:

Time (time-process value) is the representation of the changes in our universe, time has no significant meaning if it does not represent the changes.

In Our Local Universe, Time is the representation of Space-Mass-Energy Interactions / Interconversions.

According to my theory, at the beginning of Everything (Absolute Origin) was not the Absolute Nothing.

The Absolute Origin, by its definition, cannot be predisposed to any Specific Preferred State, not even to Absolute Nothingness, because there was nothing that predisposed it to any Specific Preferred State.

The absolute origin must be the superimposed sum of the absolute totality of all options, including all imaginary realities, all past-present-future, all possibilities-impossibilities, etc.

The Absolute Origin which is the Absolute Totality is like the Absolute Infinity of Existence.

The primal atoms that are transcribed in the local universes are like entities of existence of the unit (1).

During the Big Bang or similar events, the primeval atoms were transcribed / reincarnated as quantized infinitesimal entities called Quanta / reality atoms.

Almost all entities in our local universe are parallel / alternate existences with each other.

Apes and ants are what we would have ended up being if we had taken a different evolutionary path.

Every infinitesimal entity in our local universe are parallel / alternate existences of primeval atoms.

According to my theory, Space-Mass-Energy (and expressions of Reality in Our Local Universe) are various Densities of Quantized Infinitesimal Entities called Quantities / Atoms of Reality.

Quanta / Atoms of Reality represents the time-process value of our local universe.

Also, the how many / atoms of reality are roots / incarnations of primal atoms that are transcribed in our local universe.

Expansion of space, wave-particle duality, virtual particles moving in and out of existence, gravitation, gravitational lenses, etc. are the result of space-mass-energy interactions / interconversions.

Parallel or alternate universes are not optional. They should be part of Grand Reality.

The Great Totality of Reality must be the superimposed sum of all options, because all options must be given the same probability preference.

Our reality is defined by our perspective, it is as if we have a large spectrum of electromagnetic waves around us, but we can detect only a very narrow range, similarly, we can perceive only a narrow range of reality in which we have evolved.

The Absolute Totality is Immutable, Infinitely Infinite, Immortal, Eternal Singular Entity.

The time we refer to is usually the time-process value of our local universe.

The Absolute Totality is like a Rubik's Cube of infinitely infinite sides, like a static solid object that can be perceived through an infinite perspective, similarly, the Time-Value of the Process is an illusory contrast of changing perspective created by the Interactions / Interconversions of the Real-Imaginary Components of the Absolute Totality.

Space-Mass-Energy are representations of various densities of Cumulative Time-Value Content.

If space has a boundary wall, then time should have a similar wall, because space-mass-energy are a representation of the time-process value of our local universe.

Space-Mass-Energy (and other Expressions of Reality in Our Local Universe) are various densities of Quantized Infinitesimal Entities called Quantities / Atoms of Reality.

Quanta / Atoms of Reality represents the time-process value of our local universe.

Singularity / Primeval Atom (s) before transcribing Out Local Universe should have had high densities of Mass-Energy, so it should have opened wormholes connecting their past-present-future.

So, most likely, we are still within the Primitive Atom, what we experience as Space-Mass-Energy (and other Expressions of Reality in Our Local Universe) are Expressions of Cumulative Content of Process Value - Time of Our Local Universe ,

that is, as we have evolved to perceive a narrow range of electromagnetic waves as colors, similarly, we had evolved to perceive the Value-Time Content of the Cumulative Process of Our Local Universe as Space-Mass-Energy and other Expressions of Reality .

Below three are my numerical predictions, and I have clearly mentioned what they mean.

The energy represents the momentum of (m × c).

The mass represents (m × 0).

Mass and energy are like binary momentum / velocity states in our local universe.

Usamos energía para mover sistemas de masa-energía.

En condiciones normales, el momento máximo que se puede lograr diluyendo el sistema de masa-energía con energía puede ser (m × c). Es posible que necesitemos una dilución infinita para purgar completamente los componentes de masa con componentes de energía en el sistema.

Further addition of Energy to the System after achieving speed of light will only momentum by increase mass with constant speed to (M×c).

So, system will convert into form of light beam.

Einstein's Equation E=m×c^2 under current understanding is defined as Mass-Energy Equivalence, my theory extends this approach to cover Mass-Energy Equivalence with Space-Time and further more.

If we consider E=m×c^2 only as Mass-Energy Equivalence, then we have failed to see the presence and importance of “c^2” in the “E=m×c^2”.

“c^2” represents Space-Time((dx/dt)^2) Entity.

Square of “c^2=((dx/dt)^2)” represents the fact that “Energy-Mass” represents an Integrated value of “Space-Time”.

If E=m×c^3, that means in that Local Universe Energy-Mass represents double Integrated states of Space Time, higher density/condensed states.

This might be state of matter in Black Holes/Singularity, where E=m×c^n, where n is greater than or equal to 2 and in wormholes value of n should be less than 2(most probably less than 1).

(Unlike Time, Space-Mass-Energy are Real Physical Property/Phenomenon.

Mass is a property represented by Cumulative Potential Energy Content.)

(If c^2 was a dimension less quantity, then considering c^2 as a Mathematical Entity without physical significance would had been more reasonable.

If c is significant, then c^2 should be significant too.

Mass and Energy aren't equal, but Energy and m×c^2 are equal.

c^2 is the Dynamic Essence that changes Mass(Static Entity) to Energy (Dynamic Entity).

Energy represents Mass entities that can interact with Space-Time.

Energy is a representation of Mass-Space-Time Interactions.

E= (m×(dx/dt)^2) & m=(E×(dt/dx)^2)

(Energy represents momentum of (m×c).

Mass represents (m×0).

Mass and Energy are like binary states of Momentum/Speed in Our Local Universe.

We use Energy to move Mass-Energy Systems.

Under Normal Conditions, Maximum Momentum that can be achieved by diluting Mass-Energy System with Energycan be (m×c). We may need infinite dilution for completely purging out Mass Components with EnergyComponents in the System.

Because of above reasons, Mass-Energy systems can't remain stationary in space unless dynamically stabilized.

Further addition of Energy to the System after achieving speed of light will only momentum by increase mass with constant speed to (M×c).

So, system will convert into form of light beam.)

If c^2 is considered as a Mathematical device/Entity with no physical significance, Mass and Energy will become Physically Indistinguishable.)

i.e., “E=m×c^2″ really represents “Energy-Mass Entities” is Equivalent to “Space-Time Entities”.

Unlike Time, Space-Mass-Energy are Real Physical Entities/Properties.

But, Mass is a property representing Cumulative Potential Energy Content, like Quark Potential Energy. Energy resulting from Higgs field interactions etc.

On above premises, let's Consider “E=m×c^2” and “c=dx/dt”

E=m×c^2

(Energy-Mass Equivalence - This has been proven by Einstein beyond any doubt with best knowledge of mathematics and physics.)

and

c=dx/dt

(velocity=change in position w.r.t change in time), this equation help us understand that it takes 8 minutes for sun’s rays to reach earth.)

When we combine E=m×c^2 and c=dx/dt or dx=c×dt

=>

c=(E/m)^(1/2)=dx/dt

=>

i. dx/dt=((E/m)^(1/2)) => Space-Time and Energy-Mass are Equivalent Entities.

Square/Square Root function implies that Energy-Mass is an Integrated Representation of Space-Time.

ii. E= (m×(dx/dt)^2) & m=(E×(dt/dx)^2) =>Mass and Energy with Space-Time can be used to define each other, even though considering Mass as representation of Cumulative Potential Energy might be more apt.

iii. dt=(dx×((E/m)^(1/2))) => Time can be represented as an outcome of Space-Energy-Mass interactions/Interconversions.After integration of equation, Space-Mass-Energy can expressions of Cumulative Time Content.

©

Other Guides:


GET SPECIAL OFFER FROM OUR PARTNER.